logo

Debtconsolidationcare.com - the USA consumer forum

Woo-hoo! Interesting new facts!

Date: Mon, 04/24/2006 - 18:17

Submitted by Jedi Mistress Ari
on Mon, 04/24/2006 - 18:17

Posts: 2192 Credits: [Donate]

Total Replies: 32


Hey cats! Guess what I just found out!

I had a couple of friends over for sup last night, and the subject turned to cell phones, one of my guests had a call, and she didn't know the number, so she ignored it. He fiance went on to say that it was probably one of "those collectors" who really should leave their name! I went on to talk about my old jobs in collections and my knowledge ofthe laws. As it turns out, they're pretty FDCPA-savvy too! They also knew something I didn't!

The situation was, my friend's ex-husband illegally used her name and ssn to get a payday loan online which he forged her signature electronically! So, not is the debt only fraudulent, it has been repeatedly invalidated because every time she would offer to make payments, they would refuse her payments! Hence, completely invalidating the debt!

I did not know this! She does! And she is winning! The payday loan charlatans are not backing her into any corners at all! She is not being threatened with arrest or any of that crap. Since the debt is officially invalid, no matter how nasty they are, she still tells them to pound sand and there is nothing they can do about it!

There you go guys! Some new fresh ideas to chew on! I hope this helps!


It could have been any of them. She said her ex-husband illegally used her SSN, I'm not even sure she knows since she didn't volunteer a company name. In Pensacola they are all Cash America and Cashland. Since she also mentioned e-signatures, there is no telling which one it was. The point is this, e-signatures prove nothing, and she was the first to extend an offer to right the wrong, and they snubbed her offer. That is why the issue is moot.


lrhall41

Submitted by Jedi Mistress Ari on Thu, 04/27/2006 - 19:22

( Posts: 2192 | Credits: )


It will be in the best of your interest to contact the payday loan companies and arrange a payment plan with them. Explain your situation to them and offer them a realistic plan. If you stick to it, the company won't harass you.

Do all your correspondences in writing. This way, you will be able to file everything for records. Keep a follow up over the phone.


lrhall41

Submitted by david on Tue, 05/02/2006 - 12:11

( Posts: 1229 | Credits: )


Since we are discussing PDL's maybe someone can offer an answer to me. If so many of the online PDL's pull all of this illegal garbage and use shady tactics how do they remain in business? I don't mean how come people go to them, but isn't there some type of "watchdog" type of service on the internet that could have some type of control over the dishonesty. I know that the Internet is still relatively new and this might be part of the problem. I would imagine that in the Internet of the future this problem could be eliminated through newer technology. However, in any era of history and technology there is always a criminal element present.


lrhall41

Submitted by Lorri on Wed, 05/03/2006 - 19:49

( Posts: 1721 | Credits: )


A lot of these payday lenders present a "Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde" persona. They are a sweet as sugar when you are a borrower, they also approach you online, in your e-mail, in the form of spam with a headline that reads "Get $500 deposited today!". When the going gets tough, their Mr. Hyde side appears and they are as disgusting as can be. They also get around it because they are many and they are scattered throughout the world, and any given Attorney General has so much jurisdiction. Payday lenders that are based outside the U.S. slip through the cracks because they are difficult to trace. It isn't over yet though, they are beginning to be taken down one by one. What really cracks me up is that after you square away one loan, Dr. Jekyll returns, kisses your bottom, and tries to ply you with another loan.


lrhall41

Submitted by Jedi Mistress Ari on Thu, 05/04/2006 - 09:49

( Posts: 2192 | Credits: )


That is precisely the incentive I was offered to work from home as a so-called loan officer. What a crock! Other silly 'tard spams I get include farcical "approvals" for a new Mercedes-Benz, I make $25,000 annually right now! No way am I getting a Benz! Also, free laptops. And this one takes the cake- offers to join a lesbian dating site. Not that I have a problem with lesbians, I just think spamming is a desperate measure! :lol:


lrhall41

Submitted by Jedi Mistress Ari on Thu, 05/04/2006 - 10:05

( Posts: 2192 | Credits: )


one comment about the refusal of payment, It is my understanding that this refers to a refusal to allow you to tender payment as you see fit, meaning that if you offer to mail via money order/cashiers check and they state that they only want to receive it electronically then that is a reason to invalidate the debt.. a creditor always has the option top accept or not to accept partial payments and not accepting partial payments does not invalidate the debt


lrhall41

Submitted by jj on Tue, 05/09/2006 - 08:01

( Posts: 1057 | Credits: )


Quote:

Especially if the documents were signed electronically! E-signatures make the whole thing even more of a joke.


Is this meant that it is a 'pay day loan' joke or any thing that you sign electronically on line?
just curious, the Dell accounts that I have been around and around with, were signed on line electronically. But then, thats how Dell operates and if you could find a loop hole and get out of paying it because of that, I'm sure they would have changed their system a long time ago---think of the thousands, even millions that get a computer through Dell on line signing electronically. but I have wondered about this.


lrhall41

Submitted by imkimssister on Tue, 05/09/2006 - 16:21

( Posts: 1301 | Credits: )