Skip to main content
index page

Latest on Bass and Associates

Submitted by Anthony Lemons on Sat, 04/21/2007 - 15:18
Posts: 1828
Credits:
[Donate]

I am actually not too happy with the current investigation into Bass and Associates. They continue to utilize illegal tactics every day, yet nothing seems to happen. Here is the current status on the investigation: http://myfloridalegal.com/


I just got off of the phone with a very helpful employee of Bass and Associates. They were not only extremely friendly, but also honored my wishes to not call me at my job. They stated that they are bound by law to respect my employment and that they would never even consider calling me if I ever default on a loan. They are astonished to the fact that they are under investigation for violating the consumer laws. I too am very sad to hear that they are being accused of harrassing consumers and threatening them with arrest. How many liars can there be?


Submitted by on Sat, 04/21/2007 - 19:22

( Posts: 202330 | Credits: )


Great news everyone; Bass and Associates assisted me in every way possible to repay my loan. Awhile ago, I was in need for a little cash to purchase some personal things. I had my own money, but I wanted more. I am a greedy consumer, who cares not for obligations or bills due. Anyway, like the rest of you, like Cajunbulldog and Mr. Lemmons, I was a bad consumer, who took advantage of payday loans. I got me some 300 dollars and was not going to pay it back, and soon after, I get a call, from a very friendly employee of Bass and Associates, working in Jacksonville Florida. They asked if it was feasible for me to pay 25.oo dollars a month to repay the loan, and I said, sure, that would be easy, and my credit would not be harmed. A Mr. Jacobs, I believe his name was, assisted me, and Now my guilt is all gone. Thank you Bass and Associates!!!


Submitted by on Sun, 04/22/2007 - 16:46

( Posts: 202330 | Credits: )


Guest: I am so sorry that you are reduced to working for Bass and Associates, assigned to come here and pretend to be a consumer who has dealt with Basshole and ASSociates. If you were truly someone contacted by Bass to repay a loan, you would be here asking for help and to see if their tactics are illegal. Get lost.


Submitted by Anthony Lemons on Sun, 04/22/2007 - 16:59

Anthony Lemons

( Posts: 1828 | Credits: )


If you truly are David Jacobs, then let me tell you that I have enjoyed our conversations, the ones where you pretend to be law abiding. You are a crook. Changing the name of your criminal enterprise is not going to save you from yourself. You see, Mr. Jacobs, I have been, as you know, informing more and more people about your crooked ways, and total disregard for the laws in which your trade requires you to adhere to, but we here, and all over the net, are getting closer to ending your illegal activities. You will remember me, everytime someone calls your mobile phone at three in the morning, everytime you get a magazine subscription to that UPS box, which you need to pay the bill on, you will know that there is a reason why those things are transpiring, it is because you are a stalker of consumers, a thief with no emotion, a boy, trying so hard to be a man. One day, when you are serving 2-5 years for fraud, money laundering, and impersonating an enforcement agenciy...etc, when you bend over in that jail shower, to retrieve that slippery bar of soap, it may just be a consumer, standing behind you, about to screw you, worse than you screwed him. I'll send you some vasoline to ease the pain...loser.


Submitted by Anthony Lemons on Sat, 05/26/2007 - 18:34

Anthony Lemons

( Posts: 1828 | Credits: )


David Jacobs has been harassing consumers, thousands a day, so he has no leg to stand on, because no one is calling him and threatening him, as he and his employess do. I have a site meter on my site, which shows me how people found my site, and a lot of the people who come to my site 'Googled' Bass and Associates phone number.


Submitted by Anthony Lemons on Mon, 06/25/2007 - 14:14

Anthony Lemons

( Posts: 1828 | Credits: )


Freedom of information my friend. If David Jacobs chooses to have his phone number on a publicly listed voice message, that is not a cause for harassment if someone calls his phone, and besides, no one is harassing him, calling maybe, but harassment is not defined by calling a publicly listed number.


Submitted by on Mon, 06/25/2007 - 15:57

( Posts: 202330 | Credits: )


Just because David Jacobs may harass people and also has committed some acts that may be illegal does not mean that people should do the same things he does, does it?

When you constantly call someone with the sole purpose to annoy them then you are committing the crime of harassment. There really is no need to stoop to their level is it? Especially when it entails that you commit a misdemeanor.


Submitted by ramj70 on Mon, 06/25/2007 - 15:58

ramj70

( Posts: 193 | Credits: )


If someone decides to call him and ask him "hows the weather there?" that is not defined by the law to be an annoyance. If they call excessively with the INTENT to annoy, then it could be harassment, if intent is proven. Remember the Miranda Law? Innocent until proven guilty? Thank God your not a judge.


Submitted by on Mon, 06/25/2007 - 16:04

( Posts: 202330 | Credits: )


If it were easy to prove harassment, Mr. Jacobs would already be in jail if not put out of business. But, you see, even a few attorney generals have found it difficult to prove INTENT or violation of federal laws. So, please do not pretend to be in the know.


Submitted by on Mon, 06/25/2007 - 16:05

( Posts: 202330 | Credits: )


David Jacobs would hardly dare bring himself into the light of a court of law. You see, he would open himself up to being cross examined by a lawyer, who would no doubt inquire why so many consumers have filed harassment complaints with the appropriate agencies. He would then be bombarded by media, because they would like answers also. Then there may be thousands of consumers who would like a piece of David's time, in a court of law, with a class action lawsuit. When one files a petition in a court of law, they are allowing their own lives to be put under a microscope, not just the defendant's.


Submitted by on Mon, 06/25/2007 - 16:10

( Posts: 202330 | Credits: )


Well first I'm talking about state laws, not federal. Second the miranda rights you speak of have nothing to do with what we are talking about. That only applies to the police questioning you. Third there is mention of "annoy" on the second page. Fourth its pretty obvious reading most of the posts that sole purpose is to harass. Some people were born in the daytime, but not yesterday. Fifth harassment is defined as also calling someone with the intent to annoy them, it does not matter if the number is public or not. Also calling at inconvenient hours can be considered harassment.

Could David Jacobs prove harassment from the posts on this site and caller ID and phone records, who knows. But that doesn't take away the fact that people are calling him just to annoy him no matter how you try to hide it.

I despise what David Jacobs does but that doesn't take away that we in no way should do what he does, otherwise you are no better than he is. I also don't hide behind a "guest" post.


Submitted by ramj70 on Mon, 06/25/2007 - 16:16

ramj70

( Posts: 193 | Credits: )


David Jacobs and everyone else at Bass and Ass deserve what's coming to them in spades--but two wrongs don't make a right. We need to be on a higher level than them and not get in the gutter with the rest of Bass. But if he is stupid enough to have his phone number on the website, then he should at least shut the ringer off at night...I mean, hello???


Submitted by kscornell on Mon, 06/25/2007 - 19:08

kscornell

( Posts: 4407 | Credits: )