Skip to main content
index page

got served june 21

Submitted by on Sat, 08/18/2007 - 09:27
Posts: 202330
Credits:
[Donate]

i got served june 21st to appear in court by a collection lawyer in the state of Tennessee, for a capital one debt along with the summons was a attached copy of a amount saying i owed and interest and signed by a Sara Rubin supposedly a cap one agent what i find odd is thier is no account number and no capital one letter head on this paper just a amount and other fees and the total it was notarized in new york i did notice that.on june 23rd i sent a validation letter to the CA,and got back a response of passing the court date from july the 12th til october 25th due to me asking for validation also a copy of a credit application i guess because it says subject to credit approval on it,and they also stated as they get the information they will send it to me.i have heard no more since.i disputed with the big 3 and it is remains and updated if that is so havn't they whether the ca or oc broke the law by updating before validating it at my request? is that not considered taking action on the debt before validating under federal law? also they said they were not obligated under law to be licensed or because they were attorneys but thier site states and the letters i recieved clearly states they ar debt collectors?and finally is not when i asked for validation the CA instead of passing the court date to a later date should they have not dropped the case til validated is that not taking legal action before validated as my debt?

thanks James


They have until the cows come home to give you whever information you request. As long as they have it when the court date comes up that's all the is going to matter. Make sure you are keeping all copies of any letters you send them for when you do finaly go to court so that you can show the judge that you were attempting to find out if it was yours or not.


Submitted by FYI on Sat, 08/18/2007 - 10:03

FYI

( Posts: 1950 | Credits: )


Hi James...

There are a few things you need to know.

First, by federal law, they MUST update any entry in your credit bureau files once you send them a dispute letter that the account is disputed. If you do not see that on your credit reports, they are in violation of the law right there.

Next, the credit application they sent you will serve as proof of a few things--for one thing, they can continue to charge interest and fees on a debt as long as they have it, but ONLY if the interest and fees were agreed upon by you in the original credit agreement. So, review the application's terms carefully.

Next, if they cannot provide proper legal validation, as is often the case, then they cannot continue any collection efforts against you. If they cannot, I would file a motion for immediate dismissal on the grounds that the plaintiff has failed to meet the burden of proof. If they cant prove their claims that you owe them on this debt, the court should have no problem dismissing it entirely.

OK, now this is important--you got a response that changed the court date. Who sent you this response? Did it come from the court, or from the plaintiff? If it didnt come from the court, I would immediately check with the court to verify the information. A lot of these collectors use illegal tactics even when going to court because the court does not fight your battle for you--that is, you must know the law and your rights to handle the issue when they screw up. Most people dont know the law, so they never know when a collector breaks it. Verify with the court that the date change is real---some collectors would actually send you a fake letter like that and then get a default judgment against you, because you thought it was changed so you didnt show up on the original date. If they did that, dont worry, we can get that handled as well.

Finally, as for "Sara Rubin", dont let that fool you. These morons use "sworn affidavits" often, and they are actually worthless unless you let it be worth something. Once this goes to court, I would look to get a subpoena for this Sara Rubin and have her appear in person. A lot of times, they use this affidavit tactic to make it sound all official-like, but its pure crap. As a defendant you have the right to have such evidence presented in front of you properly, and this affidavit doesnt do that.

Remember this too--dont let them take forever on this. If you go to the next court date and they dont have this information, request an immediate dismissal. They should be far better prepared than this, since they need to be able to show proper validation to the court to begin with, so if in October they dont have it, file for dismissal. Then, contact the bar association in the state where their attorney practices and file a complaint against that law office. Complain that they filed a frivolous lawsuit and that they dont have any business suing people without at the very least having their ducks in a row first. They are supposed to be professionals and there is no excuse for an attorney not being a professional like that. It causes undue stress to sue someone and haul them into court for an accusation that one cannot even prove from the start, and the lawyer should have known better.


Submitted by skydivr7673 on Sat, 08/18/2007 - 20:41

skydivr7673

( Posts: 2036 | Credits: )


Thank you both and thank you Skydivr your post was very helpful.

1st. i disputed withe the credit agencies all 3 and they have updated the file or so they say and it looks as if they have.

2nd.they have updated them so i am wondering why my validation to the collections/attorneys been ful-filled? seems as if the 3 agencies have updated with info from the oc then why cannot the collection/attorneys have the info to validate?

3rd. the application is one sheet of paper all it has is slots with ssn ,name,dob,and states approval is subject to credit approval on it. there is no terms on it and nothing on the back on the front it does have a bar code???

4th. i checked and there is a court date in oct. it was passed to then when i requested validation.and if i am not mistaken is not resetting a court date when asking to be validated against the federal law of ceasing all attempt or legal action til it is validated seems to me they should dropped it til validated then if validated make the new date then??

5th. the Sara Rubin when i looked at this affidavit is seems to not be very professional laid out no capital one letter head and she signed and printed her name squeezed on the same line instead of using the 2 lines for them.

6th. i looked at the notary stamp and checked it was notarized in suffolk county New York, by a licensed notary in that county butt it must be in a office or one of those mobiel notaries NY has because she has no buisness listing.While i was checking on this I for curiousity put in Sara Rubin name and to my surpise she is a notary in nassua county NY. that is amazing i think.

7th.i researched and feel i am companate in my researching but if you have any knowledge it would be thanked.In the state of TN. a lawyer cant collect debts incurued in normal business but when they collect debts as a debt collector they must be licensed because their attorney exemption is no longer valid if they promote themselves as debt collocters or collection agency which this Grisham,Knight & and Hooper from Chattanooga Tn does?

8th. so you feel that if i let them go from june to Oct is sufficent time for them to validate ? also and is not out of line if i force them to produce it or ask for it to be deleted or dismissed perminately?


i never paid any mind to this world of debt collectors but since this and being laid up with a leg injury i have found it fasinating to read about what tatics they use to cause harm to others.


Submitted by on Sun, 08/19/2007 - 10:41

( Posts: 202330 | Credits: )


Quote:

4th. i checked and there is a court date in oct. it was passed to then when i requested validation.and if i am not mistaken is not resetting a court date when asking to be validated against the federal law of ceasing all attempt or legal action til it is validated seems to me they should dropped it til validated then if validated make the new date then??


No, you misunderstand. If you demanded validation, and they respond with a lawsuit, THAT is in violation of the fdcpa. You are seeking validation after the suit has been filed. So now you need to fight for a dismissal.

Quote:
7th.i researched and feel i am companate in my researching but if you have any knowledge it would be thanked.In the state of TN. a lawyer cant collect debts incurued in normal business but when they collect debts as a debt collector they must be licensed because their attorney exemption is no longer valid if they promote themselves as debt collocters or collection agency which this Grisham,Knight & and Hooper from Chattanooga Tn does?


If the only contact was a summons, then they are definitely acting as an attorney, and not as a collection agency--therefore, they would not need a collections license.[/quote]


Submitted by Morningstar on Sun, 08/19/2007 - 11:06

Morningstar

( Posts: 1633 | Credits: )


Quote:

5th. the Sara Rubin when i looked at this affidavit is seems to not be very professional laid out no capital one letter head and she signed and printed her name squeezed on the same line instead of using the 2 lines for them.

6th. i looked at the notary stamp and checked it was notarized in suffolk county New York, by a licensed notary in that county butt it must be in a office or one of those mobiel notaries NY has because she has no buisness listing.While i was checking on this I for curiousity put in Sara Rubin name and to my surpise she is a notary in nassua county NY. that is amazing i think.


I seem to recall reading that you should be able to successfully challenge this in court as hearsay. The appearance of the paperwork however, IMO, is not relevant.

Quote:
8th. so you feel that if i let them go from june to Oct is sufficent time for them to validate ? also and is not out of line if i force them to produce it or ask for it to be deleted or dismissed perminately?


Out of line?? No...exercising your legal rights/defense is not out of line. If you can, then it is in your best interest to get it dismissed.


Submitted by Morningstar on Sun, 08/19/2007 - 11:09

Morningstar

( Posts: 1633 | Credits: )


Quote:

2nd.they have updated them so i am wondering why my validation to the collections/attorneys been ful-filled? seems as if the 3 agencies have updated with info from the oc then why cannot the collection/attorneys have the info to validate?


It is a different process. Creditors fill out a form and send it back to the CRAs in the event of a dispute. I would bet that most of the info the creditor puts down is simply transferred from a computer screen.


Submitted by Morningstar on Sun, 08/19/2007 - 11:20

Morningstar

( Posts: 1633 | Credits: )


Quote:

1st. i disputed withe the credit agencies all 3 and they have updated the file or so they say and it looks as if they have.

2nd.they have updated them so i am wondering why my validation to the collections/attorneys been ful-filled? seems as if the 3 agencies have updated with info from the oc then why cannot the collection/attorneys have the info to validate?


ok, there are two different things at work here. When you dispute with Trans Union and the other bureaus, they do not validate--they VERIFY. These are totally different. When they verify, they do not contact the original creditor, nor does the current creditor. Verification is nothing more than "yes, the name and address on this account matches what is reported on the credit file". Validation is much more in-depth according to the law. When you request that they validate, they are required to provide this:

1--proof that the debt is actually your debt
2--proof that they have the legal right to collect on this debt
3--proof that the amount they claim is owed is correct and within the law.

If the collection people dont provide you proof of those three things, they have not provided validation.

So, when you ask the credit bureaus to verify, they contact the creditor, give them 30 days to respond, and then they tell you what happened. The creditor verified the entries, but did they also include a statement on each one that you are disputing this debt? If they did not, they just violated the law.

Quote:
3rd. the application is one sheet of paper all it has is slots with ssn ,name,dob,and states approval is subject to credit approval on it. there is no terms on it and nothing on the back on the front it does have a bar code???


Is this a blank sheet or is your information filled in on it? Also, is there a signature from you, or from anyone, on it? If not, then it is absolutely worthless to their case. It is, however, good for yours. If this is what they are claiming their credit agreement is, then they cannot charge you any interest or fees at all unless they are plainly stated on the agreement. My guess is, from experience, that this is just a basic application and once they approve someone for credit they have them sign the agreement then. So, they basically just wasted your time with that.

Also, if you did not fill that out or sign it, then it is worthless all around.

Quote:
4th. i checked and there is a court date in oct. it was passed to then when i requested validation.and if i am not mistaken is not resetting a court date when asking to be validated against the federal law of ceasing all attempt or legal action til it is validated seems to me they should dropped it til validated then if validated make the new date then??


No, they filed this case before you asked for validation. Once it is filed, that is not the same thing. They have been given until October to get their ducks in a row. As I said before, if October gets here and they still dont have 100% proper validation according to the law, you need to request an immediate dismissal. You might or might not get it at that time depending on what they have produced as validation, but I would request it anyways. They must meed the burden of proof, and if they do not, then they have no business suing you.

Quote:
5th. the Sara Rubin when i looked at this affidavit is seems to not be very professional laid out no capital one letter head and she signed and printed her name squeezed on the same line instead of using the 2 lines for them.

6th. i looked at the notary stamp and checked it was notarized in suffolk county New York, by a licensed notary in that county butt it must be in a office or one of those mobiel notaries NY has because she has no buisness listing.While i was checking on this I for curiousity put in Sara Rubin name and to my surpise she is a notary in nassua county NY. that is amazing i think.


This is more common than you realize. It is also really pathtetic. If you try to subpoena this person, I suspect that they will not be able to produce her, or that she will not be able to provide anything more than hearsay, which is not good enough. If she shows up in court and starts speaking without any documentation to back her claims up, you need to object to her testimony entirely because it is nothing but hearsay. They must prove this claim against you, and not just by talking about it. I think you will find that this case will probably go away once you start showing these people that you know what the law is and what your rights are....it seriously sounds to me like they are reaching, grasping at straws. They wouldnt need to use tactics like this bogus affidavit if they actually had proof.

Quote:
8th. so you feel that if i let them go from june to Oct is sufficent time for them to validate ? also and is not out of line if i force them to produce it or ask for it to be deleted or dismissed perminately?


You bet it is. They should have had all this information before they ever filed suit against you in my opinion. Most of these collectors dont prepare because the average person when sued will not know what to do to handle it, so they can often get away with not having any proof at all. Dont let them do that to you in this case.

Also, as I mentioned earlier, I would also complain to the bar association in the state that the lawyer practices in. Bar associations tend to look upon a lawyer filing frivolous lawsuits as a bad thing, and if they filed this suit without having the required proof to start off with, that is the chance this lawyer took. Pretty stupid chance too, if you ask me--if the proof really was there, they should have had no problem getting it long before you tell them to.

Feel free to keep us updated we will be glad to help you along....

Jon


Submitted by skydivr7673 on Sun, 08/19/2007 - 13:32

skydivr7673

( Posts: 2036 | Credits: )


UPDATE! i sent a letter after 60 days feeling this was ample time to validate and told them if they do not have validation they should delete this from my credit report.about 2 weeks later i recieved a letter back from the same attorney or debt collector
they are attornies but also debt collection agents lol. well anyway the letter i recieved said enclosed it the application statements and all the paper ledger of this matter, well i turned that envelope inside out and was nothing else in it .lol i am still amazed that they sued me then i asked validation so they moved the court date 3 months and after 60 days i wrote the letter feelin this was ample time to validate it or delete it,then i recieve a letter sayin this and that was enclosed but it was empty.
PLEASE GIVE THOUGHTS ON THIS!!!!!


Submitted by on Sat, 09/22/2007 - 16:40

( Posts: 202330 | Credits: )


Oh wow! U have GOT to be kidding right? I'm guessing send them another dv letter and state in there what just happened! I'm stumped though... i'm sure someone who knows more will be along shortly to help u with this James!
These people NEVER cease to amaze me!
:roll:
Ang


Submitted by Ang on Sat, 09/22/2007 - 16:43

Ang

( Posts: 2306 | Credits: )


no kidding ang.no wonder so many people get confused over a CA tatics and no wonder the CA's make so m uch money


Submitted by on Sun, 09/23/2007 - 07:50

( Posts: 202330 | Credits: )


yes they sent me a supposed validation but was nothing included lol.this company is wild or something. a attorney who claims to not be a debt collector so does not need a license due to that,but they in communication letters state they are debt collectors lol.so far the not validating it to me. verify it at credit bureaus... is 2 violations,then this fradualnt letter with no validation inclosed is 3? andsueing e with not proper proof 4? and then the verify at CB is that not a 5th is that not action on the case without verifing?


Submitted by on Sun, 09/23/2007 - 10:04

( Posts: 202330 | Credits: )


To begin with, almost everyone in a given law office is a notary public; second of all affidavits are not typically on company's letterhead (they are typically printed on paper with the caption on top of it) and the list goes on and on. The affidavit will stand up if this person exists.

The other thing you need to do, is even though the ocurt date (or time to respond to complaint has been extended), you should ask for a 'stipulation extending time to respond to complaint', so it has both your signatures on it and is filed with the court. This will ensure the new date is set in stone.


Submitted by on Mon, 09/24/2007 - 19:55

( Posts: 202330 | Credits: )