logo

Debtconsolidationcare.com - the USA consumer forum

Default judgement help please

Date: Wed, 03/25/2009 - 20:43

Submitted by wisst
on Wed, 03/25/2009 - 20:43

Posts: Credits: [Donate]

Total Replies: 3


My husband has a default judgement against him and we're not sure what to do. Have talked to and paid attorneys but they say bankruptcy is the only option. I'll try to stick to the facts but we honestly aren't sure what this is for.

Husband had a nasty divorce in 1998 and there were some unpaid bills from that time. In April 2006 he was served with summons and complaint, but didn't understand that he had to answer, was waiting for notice of court date. In August 2007 a default judgement was entered against him. He has assumed that it's for a GM cc. We are in MN and the Sol is 6 years. I recently found a Credit report from 2003 that shows DLA as 1998 on the GM card.

Judgement was granted to Palisades Collection LLC Assignee of HRSI. A google search looks like HRSI is a healthcare collector. Hubby just told me tonight that the ex-wife tried to use an old insurance card in 2001 for a surgery, so maybe this has something to do with that?!

Should he send them a validation letter? We need to get this taken care of but am worried that they may garnish or freeze accounts if we contact them. Anyone have any ideas where to start? Thanks


After getting a judgment, I think that there is no use sending a debt validation letter because the creditor already got the judgment by default. Now, since the SOL in MN is 10 years on judgment, they can recover the debt anytime within this period. So, if you do not want to file bankruptcy, just wait for the creditor to take the first step because you cannot stop them from garnishing your account.


lrhall41

Submitted by jstn.credit on Thu, 03/26/2009 - 04:53

( Posts: 139 | Credits: )


Contact the court of record and obtain a copy of the case file. The bad part here is that you ignored a summons and a default was entered in against you. BK is an option but I would first consult with a NACA atty in your area. Sounds like this could be considered a case of fraud and/or IDT by the ex-wife. www.naca.net


lrhall41

Submitted by NASCAR_Devil on Thu, 03/26/2009 - 05:02

( Posts: 4671 | Credits: )