logo

Debtconsolidationcare.com - the USA consumer forum

GC SERVICES, where to go now?

Date: Wed, 11/26/2008 - 09:25

Submitted by anonymous
on Wed, 11/26/2008 - 09:25

Posts: 202330 Credits: [Donate]

Total Replies: 37


Hi there,
First of all I have to say thank you to everyone here for all the invaluable information you have placed on the forums. It has really helped me in knowing how to deal with these issues.
Second, I need some help, and I am hoping someone here will know the best way to proceed from here.

I am an authorized signer on a credit card, not the primary holder, so technically I know I am not obligated to pay the credit card debt. That being said, a family member (fm1)is the primary but the debt is mine not theirs. They got me this card to use, and for years although I have incurred a large debt on it, I have always made the payments on time and usually well above the minimum.
My problem came when I lost my job a few months ago and because the cc company kept raising the interest rate, to at last count %28.99 I just couldn't afford to make the payment. Once I became delinquent the debt grew exponentially, and it became apparent that I was not going to be able to come up with that kind of cash. I tried to get the cc company to take a partial pmt, but they wouldn't. A couple weeks ago they sent a letter stating that fm1 (I) had 21 days to pay all the past due amts + all the fees that were now in excess of $4000.00 or they would send it to collections. I tried to again contact them, but they wouldn't even speak to me as I am not the primary.
Last week, a collection agency, GC Services Limited Partnership, called my fm1, the primary.
I had not said anything to fm1, since I assumed I still had time to come up with all the money. Well, needless to say fm1 was very upset when they spoke to GC.
I told fm1 that indeed I am behind on the payment, and that I wanted to take care of it.

I asked another family member (FM2) to intervene on this matter who would be able to stay calm and be a "neutral" 3rd party. He called Dan at GC in Elgin IL and he said he needed fm1's permission for him to talk to us. Fine, fm2 called fm1 and they called Dan.
FM2 then spoke to Dan again and told him he wanted to settle this matter for fm1 and offered him $8000, (the amount the cc company says fm1 now owes with all their fees and charges and interest is just over $15000. He said because the fm1 is working that they wouldn't settle for anything less then 60 cents on the dollar, which would be $9192. This was last Wednesday night. fm2 said he would see if he could do that, and that fm2 would call Dan back the following evening.
fm2 called him back on Thursday, and said that yes, fm2 would agree to pay the $9192, in full with a cashiers check as soon as he received a settlement letter from him that states it would be pif and all derogs would be taken off credit reports. fm2 told him it would take him a few days to get the funds and for them to clear his account and that he would have the funds by the 5th of Dec. He then tried to insist that fm2 send him a postdated check for the 1st of Dec. now, and that fm2 could put a stop payment on it, and that he would not cash it, and that when the funds had cleared fm2's account that fm2 could then send him the cashiers check and he would send fm2's check back. He insisted he had to have a payment on the books before the end of the month, or the cc company would sue fm1. fm2 tried to tell him "no check, postdated or not" but he was relentless. fm2 finally just said, look send me a letter, cause I will not send anything without the settlement agreed to in writing. He said he would.
We received some initial contact letter from GC on Sat. but that was postdated on Wednesday, so I assumed he was still sending the settlement agreement letter.
On Monday evening fm2 gets a call from Dan. fm2 was busy and let his answering machine take a message. Dan sounded totally confused and was saying that he needed the money in his hands by the 25th, well it was already the night of the 24th. That he had sent the letter fm2 requested on Friday, and that we should have it already, or by tomorrow, the 25th. He babbled for a few minutes, and then hung up.

During this time we still had not received a letter and as of yesterday's mail still have not. I have the funds waiting in my account to pay them, but since I didn't get or really count on them sending one I would agree to have typed up our own letters, based on the samples you have here. We have the initial settlement letter based on the phone conversation, and a second one for GC to sign date and send back, and one for fm1 giving permission for fm2 to act on their behalf.
Yesterday Dan must have called both fm1 and 2 a dozen times, leaving messages with fm2 that he had to have the check now, to call right away. Well, fm2 works all day, and cannot answer his cell phone which is the number Dan has. So when fm2 got home from work, he called Dan again to tell him he had still not received a letter, but that he had prepared letters for them instead of waiting since he wanted to take care of this in a timely matter. When fm2 called, Dan had gone home for the evening and would be back this morning. The person that answered the phone asked if he could help, and fm2 said no thank you, I will call Dan in the morning.

This morning fm2 called, and told Dan that the letter still hadn't come in yesterdays mail, and that rather then wait he was sending them a letter for them to sign and send back and once fm2 had that in hand, that he would immediately send the cashiers check. Well with that someone else was on the phone, don't know who, but fm2 assumed it was a boss. Boss started yelling, fm2 had to get the money to them by 4pm today, and started threatening both fm2 and fm1. Then another man got on the line and it got worse, he said they were not going to sign our letter, and would take everything fm2 owns etc. Fm2 stayed calm, and just said, look no letter, no money. Fm2 said you have two options, either you get the money when I get it in writing or you get nothing, that fm1 will just file for bankruptcy. The man on the line started screaming fm1 can't do that they can't file against us we will take everything.

So fm2 just hung up.

That is where it stands now. I have the money to settle, but without a letter stating the amount that that they will clear credit report, I will not give them a dime. What is the point? Fm1 agrees. They have violated a number of laws so far, and although their initial letter said that they are licensed in the state we all live in I don't find a license, or a bond which is required if they don't have an office here in my state. Their letter doesn't have a license number on it, only the words in bold print that they are licensed in the state of ___

Any suggestions as to what to do now? Do we send the letters to them and hope they will sign it and send it back or do we wait? Do we just get in touch with an attorney and use the money to fight?

Thanks


you are doing the right thing by not sending this bottomfeeder
any money without something in writing agreeing to the amount,and that they won't sell the remaining balance.by the way you or your realtive can file BK.any action by this bottomfeeder i would consider illegal.like reporting on your credit report.just keep your stance.nothing in writing no money.


lrhall41

Submitted by paulmergel on Wed, 11/26/2008 - 09:39

( Posts: 15514 | Credits: )


Yes, you seem to have this well in hand. It should raise a lot of red flags that they keep pushing, then pushed for a check telling you you could 'stop payment'. The second you did that they would be screaming at you about "check fraud" which I honestly thing they wanted you to do.

The fact is this company showed their true colors by these 'bosses' getting on the phone.

I would not deal with them strictly over the mail system, send them letters and see where it goes from there.


lrhall41

Submitted by goldenbast on Wed, 11/26/2008 - 10:36

( Posts: 2884 | Credits: )


Thank you Paul and Golden,
Yeah to be honest after fm1 told me who called, I googled the name, and found this forum and many other sites with all kinds of horror stories about them and their illegal tactics. So when fm2 spoke to Dan the first couple times and found Dan to be very nice and seemed to want to work with us and settle this I was pleasently surprised, but still very cautious. I KNEW never do any monetary transactions without a contract. But I also knew there was a good possibility that if I sent them a check that they could or would pull something like you said, and then not only would I be out that money but also in trouble for check fraud. How stupid do these people think we are????

For now I guess we wait and see if a letter comes in the mail by Friday. Do you think I should send out my set of letters to them registered receipt requested of course?
You know the funny thing is...they never once gave me an address to send the check to, or the name of who to make it out to. Then on their conversation, or should I say confrontation with fm2 this morning, the last boss told fm2 that he had till 4pm today to fax him a check, or else! What the H***? What good would a faximile of a check do? it is not considered "legal tender" they can't exactly take a fax to the bank can they? I know that the moment they got an account number they would try to electronically clear that account out.


lrhall41

Submitted by jjbrody on Wed, 11/26/2008 - 10:58

( Posts: 14 | Credits: )


Thanks Soaplady,
BTW, what about the fact that GC is not even licensed in my state, even though their initial contact letter say specifically that they are but does not list a license number. Are they even legally allowed to collect from me in this state, and all of the parties, fm1 fm2 and myself live here.


lrhall41

Submitted by jjbrody on Wed, 11/26/2008 - 11:07

( Posts: 14 | Credits: )


I did a search at my states department of commerce licensing div. and they were listed in a number of states with licenses, including Ill. which is the office that contacted us, but my state does not show them as having a current license here. Also my state, Mn. says that if a collection agency does not have an actual physical office in this state, but wishes to do business here they have to post a surity bond for $20,000. I checked that too, and as far as my states site is concerned, they don't show one for GC in Mn either. I understand that they do collections for the dept of edu, but that doesn't mean they are the only one who the dept has contracted.


lrhall41

Submitted by jjbrody on Wed, 11/26/2008 - 11:23

( Posts: 14 | Credits: )


What if I told you these creeps paid less than $900 for your account and that your check for $9192 will be accepted for a very nice profit. They are pulling your chain. Because they would not comply, I would offer them $3000 now at the end of the month when their Quota bonuses are met because they have not complied with your request for written receipt. Ps make sure your request for PiF comes on their Company Letter Head.


lrhall41

Submitted by on Wed, 11/26/2008 - 11:26

( Posts: | Credits: )


Just thought I would give you all an update, mail just came, not a thing from GC. I think Dan was not truthful in his statement that he had sent a settlement letter last Friday. BTW fm2 has that statement from Dan also on his voicemail.
Even junk snailmail would have been here by now from Il.
Now if the tables were turned, do you think they would be tollerant of us saying "it's in the mail" and to not receive anything within 5 days. :roll:


lrhall41

Submitted by jjbrody on Wed, 11/26/2008 - 13:17

( Posts: 14 | Credits: )


Thank you guest, yes Nascar, I do live in Minnesota.
We sent our set of letters to GC's office in Elgin Il yesterday, registered return receipt. Since they never did give us an address to mail to other then the one on the initial form letter which has just a PO Box for GC's headquarters in Texas, we decided to use the one that tied to the phone number which Dan had called from. I knew that would not be able to send a registered receipt requested letter to a PO Box. So I guess we will see what happens. fm2 was absolutely amazed that in his last conversation that the last boss he spoke with, the "portfolio mgr" said that if we did not have the money to them by 4 pm that day that they would NOT accept our money. fm2 said you're telling me that you would rather have zero then 9grand? He said "yup". and fm2 said "okay, it's your choice", and hung up. Do you all think they will really turn down that money and decide to either turn it back in to OC or sue? Are these people mad?? :shock:


lrhall41

Submitted by jjbrody on Thu, 11/27/2008 - 05:48

( Posts: 14 | Credits: )


Actually you can send CMRR to a PO Box..I do it all the time. basically when they pick up the mail they see a little slip that tells them they have a certified letter waiting for them and then they go up and sign for it. :)

Look into recording calls and get those calls recorded. You already sent the letters CMRR so that is good....stand firm. If they do sue, they will look awfully stupid when you break out all the proof of how you bent over backwards to pay this off but it was the company that stalled you at every turn.....imagine the judge's reaction when you prove that you had the money all ready to go, just needed them to sign the agreement......they will look like fraudsters for not wanting to sign the agreement....after all, why would they NOT sign it unless they had no intention of honoring the agreement? :)


lrhall41

Submitted by goldenbast on Thu, 11/27/2008 - 12:18

( Posts: 2884 | Credits: )


I am not sure they will bother calling now. Just received their letter, amazing that they actually sent one! But... it was dated and postmarked Friday the 21st of Nov, (like Dan said he did). The thing is that in the letter it states "if settlement amount is not received by 11-26-08, this offer will become null and void."
Today is the 28th for goodness sake. They sent it plain old snail mail and expected us to receive it and get the money in their hands (at the busiest time of the year mail wise) in 4 mail days????? That is totally unreasonable.
I just don't know what we should do now, just wait?????


lrhall41

Submitted by jjbrody on Fri, 11/28/2008 - 13:30

( Posts: 14 | Credits: )


Bump-
It is now Tuesday, and we have not had a single phone call from GC. We should get our green card back either today or tomorrow, that is if someone there signed it. If we do and they have signed, meaning received it, what then? Do we continue to wait, do we call, or should we DV them to make sure that they can't just go file suit? From the settlement letter they sent us they said that they were "authorized by OC, (who btw is Citibank) to offer us a settlement blah...blah..blah, and that they..GC does not put remarks on CR, so I am assuming that GC does not own the account, but is acting as a third party for citi. Which from what I have read that they would have to kick it back to citi and citi would be the ones who would sue, right?

Has anyone settled successfully with GC?

Thanks


lrhall41

Submitted by jjbrody on Tue, 12/02/2008 - 06:22

( Posts: 14 | Credits: )


Hi guest,
not a whole lot. It was quite for a while. They received our settlement letter on Dec. 1st, and we heard nothing. Then about a week ago fm1 started getting calls from Dan again threatening to sue if fm1 didn't pay up. Fm1 was upset that he was calling them again rather then calling fm2 since they had sent GC a letter authorizing fm2 to negotiate on their behalf. Fm2 has not gotten any calls from GC. Dan's last voice mail message to fm1 was that he had a "case number" for them, and to call him so he could give it to them. That was a week ago. Fm2 sent a DV letter to GC, and in it stated unequivocally that all communications were to be in writting ( no more phone calls.) That was sent out CRRR on Wednesday 12/17/08 and although we have not received the green receipt yet, they should have received it yesterday. I don't know if they continued to call fm1 since the one last Monday (case number message). Also just received a new bill from the OC, of course with more fees and interest charges, but without any references to it being sent to collections. Just the message that "this bill is seriously past due". I don't expect GC to abide by the law to not call, (actually I hope they don't so we have something more to fight them on)
I was actually wondering myself, if we should send a settlement letter to OC, and see if they want to "play ball now"

Are you also dealing with GC Services? Let us know how it is going with your situation. And good luck!


lrhall41

Submitted by jjbrody on Tue, 12/23/2008 - 05:13

( Posts: 14 | Credits: )


GC is not a nice co to deal with. They are a collection agency that works for the OC. I had to deal with them on my Citi card. They get real mean and you need to remain calm and don't react to their threats. I personaly would not have sent a C&D letter because if want something settled fast you need to be able to comunicate with them. They give you the run around alot, every time I spoke with someone it was like starting all over again, this is a trick they keep notes everytime you speak to someone. You need to tell them you need a new settlement letter with new dates stating your agreement, again before you send money. If you had access to a fax they can fax the letter to you. I settled my account at 50% in payments. They keep telling me No, I was patient and finally got the call on the "good news" as they put it. It was not easy and when they good mean on the phone I just said I have to go now and hung up. They do push alot at the end of the month.


lrhall41

Submitted by on Wed, 12/24/2008 - 09:50

( Posts: | Credits: )


Hi time 2 wine,
Yes, I already know they are not exactly the nicest people to deal with.
I didn't send a C&D I sent a DV, (debt validation) letter to them which in it I added that all communication is to be by US mail. They were continuously calling fm1, about paying, when in fact fm1 had already told them both verbally and in writing that fm2 has their permission to negotiate a settlement for fm1. Fm1 wants nothing to do with this whole thing, and it upsets them that GC are being such *&%*&^ people. Fm1 is the one that doesn't want GC to call anymore.
As for settling, they already have my settlement letter in their hands, and it was for 60% of the total, in one full payment. Is all they would have to do is sign it and send it back to me and they would have their money within days. I don't understand how a OC could allow them to turn down such an offer if in fact GC was contracted to collect and didn't buy it outright. They could have had the money almost a month ago if they had really wanted to settle. The whole thing makes no sense to me, unless they were afraid of the "paper trail". That is also why I DVed them, I am wondering if in fact they are legally collecting for OC, or are they just trying to scam me?


lrhall41

Submitted by jjbrody on Fri, 12/26/2008 - 19:55

( Posts: 14 | Credits: )


Sorry, I guess what I meant was that if you want a quick settlement then you need to speak to them on the phone. limiting yourself to snailmail will slow things down. I understand why you did it, but, that's the way debt settlement is. Their job is to get as much money as possible thru scare tactics and intimidation. They way I have been settleing my accounts is once I reach an agreement (after many calls) on the phone then I tell them to send me a settlement letter to the terms we agreed on, on thier letterhead, once I recieve it I send the money. They are under no obligation to agree to and sign anything you send them. If I were you I would ask them for a new settlement letter on their letterhead with a new agreed upon date.


lrhall41

Submitted by on Mon, 12/29/2008 - 10:31

( Posts: | Credits: )


That's okay time2wine.
I was not the one who has delayed a quick settlement, they are. They are the ones that decided to send me a settlement letter which had an expiration date 5 days from the day they mailed it. They knew full well that there was no way for me to receive the letter and send them payment within that time frame. It specifically stated that after that date, their offer was null and void, thus invalidating the settlement. So if I had sent them money there was no written guarantee that they wouldn't continue to try to collect the remainder.

That being said, they received our DV letter on Dec. 23, with the no phone calls stipulation, and today they have called 3 times and hung up. They leave no messages. That is a clear violation of FDCPA 805 and 806.

Now if someone could tell me do I file a complaint with my state AG, or do I have to hire an attorney and sue them? :?


lrhall41

Submitted by jjbrody on Tue, 12/30/2008 - 15:26

( Posts: 14 | Credits: )


Thank you Soaplady,
Sorry it took so long to reply to your post, I had some other personal business to take care of.
Since my last post I have received one phone call, hang up each day from GC, and in yesterdays mail we received another "settlement letter" from them. The same amount as we had agreed on in our original conversations, but this time it is without a deadline to send it in. They again stipulate in it, and I quote: " *As of the date of this letter, you owe $15321.59. (which btw is not what the last bill said from the OC). Because of interest, late charges, and other charges that may vary from day to day, the amount due on the day you pay may be greater. Hence, if you pay the amount shown above, an adjustment may be necessary after we receive your check, in which event we will inform you."
In other words, again they can still attempt to collect more money after we send them this settlement amount. I DON"T THINK SO!!!!
Another odd thing, the letter is dated Dec. 18, 2008, (well after they received our DV letter, which to me seems like they are again violating the FDCPA by continuing to try to collect a debt after they have been sent a DV, but before they have validated it) and although the letter was dated for the 18th, it wasn't mailed until the 29th of Dec. And the wording in it is as if it is the first letter they have sent us again with the statement "Please note that this letter does not reduce your rights as stated on the reverse portion thereof, please refer to the reverse side of this letter for an explanation of your rights. (The reverse is a statement of our right to dispute the debt within 30 days etc.) There isn't a single mention of the previous communications, or the fact that they have already received a DV letter disputing the debt and requesting validation based on our rights under FDCPA.
Really odd :?
Fm2 said "just call an attorney and let him handle it". He said he would rather give him (the attorney) the money then these idiots.


lrhall41

Submitted by jjbrody on Sat, 01/03/2009 - 15:34

( Posts: 14 | Credits: )


You can look up the FDCPA online. Also, there are settlement agreements you can get at about 60% of your debt or even less. Then your credit report reflects Settled In Full, not Paid In Full. They are 3rd party for DOE, but they run 1st party for cc's too. They both try to scare you, but only the DOE debts can be garnished without litigation. Some of the people are nice and try to help people, some are bozos and only in it for the money. Either way, you can pay, or not, it's up to you. Who needs credit anyway.


lrhall41

Submitted by on Wed, 05/06/2009 - 11:42

( Posts: | Credits: )


this is very interesting. I just googled GC svs after getting a call for my neighbor. the guy said that it was a business matter, and that my neighbor had given my name as the closest neighbor - I knew it was BS, said I was housesitting, and did not even know if that was who lived next door. can they call me? he did not say the call was being recorded, or that it was an attempt to collect a debt. can I get in on this class action lawsuit now? he left his name and phone number w/ext. sure was glad to find this website.


lrhall41

Submitted by on Wed, 02/24/2010 - 09:31

( Posts: | Credits: )