Skip to main content
index page

Law Offices of Harold Scherr

Submitted by on Fri, 08/10/2007 - 09:12
Posts: 202330
Credits:
[Donate]

Here's a good story on this bottom feeder. I went to a small claims mediation and confronted one of their "attorneys" on a $4000 credit card debt. Way prior to the mediation, I submitted a certified DV letter to them. No response. I also included in that DV letter that the SOL had run out. So at the mediation, I bring up the letter to the attorney. (By the way, the mediator would NOT allow my copy of the DV letter to be considered because he said he, as a mediator, was not a judge and was not allowed to consider it in mediation). The attorney sat there and said "We don;t have to respond. Your validation documents were attached to the summons. I told him that what was attached to the summons were documents from a collection agency (namely CACV)NOT the original creditor, thus, invalid. He told me I wasn't an attorney and didn't know the law. He also shot down the SOL, again stating I was wrong. I'm in Florida. The SOL charts I have say an "open account" (credit card) is 4 years. The attorney said it's a written account, not an open account (5 years). For me, mediation was a waste of time. I'll go to court. I'm not going to sit there in the midst of his violations and accept a choice of "pay it or take a judgment". As an aside, I did learn that CACV will accept a settlement of 40-50% of the debt if you have it. I don't. He was prepared to settle for $2000.

I don't like mediation for the reason that you can't enter any written evidence, at least in my case. What I don't understand is why is the attorney's toilet paper "validation" allowed but my DV letter is not.


That seems really unfair. I don't blame you in your choice to go to court. If the SOL has run out and you claim it then there should be nothing else left to say. I have a feeling that I may have to end up going to court on an old Discover card account so I will keep in mind that mediation may not be such a good idea.


Submitted by eleroo on Fri, 08/10/2007 - 09:32

eleroo

( Posts: 1220 | Credits: )


eleroo...it's my opinion that mediation is a waste of time. Mediators are not judges. Mediation boils down to three things...pay the debt, accept a judgment or fight it in court. Especially collection attorneys know that most people really don't want to go to court and prolong the issue, thinking they have to get an attorney they can't afford and other things. Problem is, you are forced into mediation by summons. If you don't go, you'll simply get a quick default judgment against you for not showing up. If anything happens with the Discover Card and you get a summons, RESPOND in writing to the summons, regardless of whether or not it says no response is needed. Sometimes you can change the course of things if you have valid arguments. I had a problem with Discover years ago when they were part of the Sears Financial Network. I don't know if they still are because Citibank now handles Sears accounts. Back then, Sears was relentless on collections. The worst. Even back then they maintained their ridiculous credit card interest rates and still do. For that reason, I would never again want a Sears credit card or any of their credit products. Fortunately, I never got sued because the debt went way past the statutes in my state. When that happened, they basically gave up and I never heard from them again and it has long fallen off my credit reports.


Submitted by on Fri, 08/10/2007 - 09:54

( Posts: 202330 | Credits: )


I went to mediation in Pinellas County Florida. I had a certified letter to the original creditor saying that I wanted to settle way before the summons. They never responded. The lawyer said that Bray and Lunsford called 20 times and I did not return calls according to there phone log. They call and hang up on your anwering system but it shows on their log as a completed call. I had no problem paying what I owed but did not think it right that I should pay court costs and attorney fees which were more than the debt. It was pay or go to court and get a judgement. It was better to pay than get a judgement. Even if the judgement was smaller than the payment it is still a judgement which would be on my record for years. It is a railroad system.


Submitted by Frogpatch on Fri, 08/10/2007 - 10:23

Frogpatch

( Posts: 5381 | Credits: )


Thanks Guest for the advice. I know the Sears saga well. They were actually my first credit card. I remember when they and Discover were affiliated. Anyway, I defaulted (about 3 days late if I remember correctly) on my Sears payment and it ended up costing me a fortune!!! Looking back, that was my first lesson in credit card rip-offs. I was only about 18 and had no idea how much 3 days would cost me. (I found out real quick. :-) :-) )

Frogpatch, I have been getting calls from
408-387-6586 pretty regularly. You don't happen to remember the number of the collection agency that called and kept hanging up do you? Callers from the 408 number above keep doing the same thing. They also call about twice an hour on some days and just yesterday both my cell phone and work phone were ringing at the same time with someone calling from the 408 number. I googled it and found a site where about 10 other people had logged complaints about the same number.

I think it was ridiculous also that you had to pay the fees. Especially when you had documentation stating you attempted to settle.


Submitted by eleroo on Sat, 08/11/2007 - 06:16

eleroo

( Posts: 1220 | Credits: )


I too have had run in with the SCHERR LAW FIRM........they threatened to call my neighbors and everything.....I simply said that I want to pay but FIRST tell me what it is you are asking payment for....when they said the credit card and amount , I said that amount is way HIGH....THE WOMAN PROCEEDED to become beligerent and threatening even after I said I was willing to pay just get me a lowered settlement amount...is there any law against calling neighbors and bothering you at home on a Saturday when their website says they are closed on Saturdays?


Submitted by on Sat, 08/23/2008 - 12:01

( Posts: 202330 | Credits: )


I too have had run in with the SCHERR LAW FIRM........they threatened to call my neighbors and everything.....I simply said that I want to pay but FIRST tell me what it is you are asking payment for....when they said the credit card and amount , I said that amount is way HIGH....THE WOMAN PROCEEDED to become beligerent and threatening even after I said I was willing to pay just get me a lowered settlement amount...is there any law against calling neighbors and bothering you at home on a Saturday when their website says they are closed on Saturdays?


Submitted by on Sat, 08/23/2008 - 12:01

( Posts: 202330 | Credits: )


I am being totally bothered by these people at Scherr..........they were beligerent..........and all I asked was what was the debt they were referring to..........they told me the credit card and the amount and ALL I SAID was that is a high number.........I will gladly pay if you can get the credit card to come to a settlement number minus all the fees and whatever they decided to put on top of principle........they became downright beligerent and hung up.........NOW HOW DO YOU EXPECT ME TO PAY PEOPLE WHO WON'T EVEN LISTEN TO ME..........I SAID I WOULD PAY BUT THEY WANTED PAYMENT AT THIS MOMENT AND THREATENED TO CALL MY NEIGHBORS....I AM SURE THAT IS QUITE ILLEGAL.........THESE PEOPLE ARE TRYING TO RUIN MY CREDIT EVEN AFTER I SAID I WOULD PAY JUST GET ME A REASONABLE SETTLEMENT NUMBER


Submitted by on Sat, 08/23/2008 - 12:09

( Posts: 202330 | Credits: )


I am being totally bothered by these people at Scherr..........they were beligerent..........and all I asked was what was the debt they were referring to..........they told me the credit card and the amount and ALL I SAID was that is a high number.........I will gladly pay if you can get the credit card to come to a settlement number minus all the fees and whatever they decided to put on top of principle........they became downright beligerent and hung up.........NOW HOW DO YOU EXPECT ME TO PAY PEOPLE WHO WON'T EVEN LISTEN TO ME..........I SAID I WOULD PAY BUT THEY WANTED PAYMENT AT THIS MOMENT AND THREATENED TO CALL MY NEIGHBORS....I AM SURE THAT IS QUITE ILLEGAL.........THESE PEOPLE ARE TRYING TO RUIN MY CREDIT EVEN AFTER I SAID I WOULD PAY JUST GET ME A REASONABLE SETTLEMENT NUMBER


Submitted by on Sat, 08/23/2008 - 12:09

( Posts: 202330 | Credits: )


I too had a run in with Scherr law. Funny people, lazy rude and do not know how to add numbers. I too went to mediation,( with MR. Scherr himself) went to court and lost. AND THEY STILL SETTleted for a lot less than they ever orginal wanted!! DO NOT PAY THEM ANYTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The longer it goes on, the less amount of of money they will except. RECORD EVERY PHONE CALL WITH THEM. If they discuss your or try to attempt to collect the debt from anyone but yourself it is ILLEGAL. If they tell you they are going to send a police officer to your house it is ILLEGAL! RECORD, them-- contact a lawyer and then meet MR. Scherr in mediation on your behalf! You will win!


Submitted by on Thu, 12/04/2008 - 21:33

( Posts: 202330 | Credits: )


I work for the Scherr Law Firm and I want to apologize for anything inappropriate and illegal said to anyone. There are many bad apples in the collection business and they make everyone else look bad.

First and foremost, respond to the summons you receive even if it is a small claims matter that doesn't require an answer, it is in your best interest to answer it.

Secondly, keep in mind that all collection matters are done over the phone. Do not expect anyone to send you a letter responding to your issues; they will call.

Third, sending a cease and desist is not such a great idea. Not only will you stop receiving documentation pertaining to your case, but you will make the collector who is handling your case angry. This is a two way street. It requires both parties to communicate in order to resolve. The same goes to debt validation. Unless you honestly believe this is a case of identity fraud, it is wrong to request validation. You are wasting everybodys time and money. Every cent spent trying to sue you is added onto your balance. And the more time you spend ignoring and stalling on this is going to increase your balance.

Sign a stipulation for a reasonable amount. It stops any and all interest from being applied to your account unless defaulted on and ALL CALLS STOP.


Submitted by on Thu, 12/25/2008 - 17:49

( Posts: 202330 | Credits: )


sorry guest three,but don't go shoveling that garbage about not validating and not getting anything in writing.that is a crock and you know it.also let's say you call me and like everyone else i get threatened.i will if i have an address will send a DV and C&D letters faster than your head can spin.after you receive those letters anything that's considered collection activity including filing a lawsuit will be breaking the law.bottom line your a TROLL.i didn't delete your stupidity because i wanted to shoot it down.now SHOVE OFF!!!


Submitted by paulmergel on Thu, 12/25/2008 - 18:25

paulmergel

( Posts: 15514 | Credits: )


Paul Mergel.

The problem is that you are uneducated about what you're talking about.

It is your right to send a cease and desist letter faster than my head can spin but it is also my client's right to sue you faster than you can lick the stamp for that envelope.

No one in the collection business is going to do two things:
1. Call someone after there is a cease and desist.
2. Call someone when there is an attorney representing them.

And filing suit and serving a summons is in no way a violation of your cease and desist. What you don't seem to understand is that there is a difference between not contacting someone and not collecting on a valid and owed debt. You think your letter means we have to stop any collection activity - you are wrong.

As for the threats you feel you're getting, that is something you would need to take up with the person you feel threatened by. You seem to have trouble differentiating between uneducated beliefs and facts, so keep in mind that if a collector at this law firm is telling you that you will be sued - they are not threatening you, they are telling you that YOU WILL BE SUED. And they will push for a judgment. And put a title lien on your property. And garnish your wages if necessary and you fit the criteria.

I never said not to get anything in writing. Get everything in writing. They are more than happy to draft settlement and paid documentation for you.

And as for validation, YOU KNOW and I KNOW that it is a stall tactic and nothing more.

Stop acting like a baby and take responsibility for your actions.


Submitted by on Tue, 12/30/2008 - 13:55

( Posts: 202330 | Credits: )


so put a lien on property, better have the judgement first and next understand that no money is received until the property is sold, want to wait 20 years? the collection aagency bought a bad debt, how dumb is that? what you think they paid, 10 cents on the dollar? if not, they paid too much, so cease and desist is correct and it is illegal to cal neighbors, relatives other than for a location verification, read my lips, next there is a SOL for each state and needs to be followed, don't try to bamboozle those who owe the money and fell on hard times...there will be more after the inaugural , you really think that poor unemployed people can pay? let the Treasury dept float some money the poor people's direction to make things work. and most of all the collection agencies arent too bright buying bad debt.


Submitted by on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 10:29

( Posts: 202330 | Credits: )


you all should have thought about that before you took credit cards out. everyone falls on hard times, its up to you to come through them. i am so sick of everyone crying about the economy no jobs, etc. look harder and accept less. it is not illegal to call neighbors.

own up to your responsibilities and pay your bill. you charged it up.


Submitted by on Tue, 07/14/2009 - 06:58

( Posts: 202330 | Credits: )


You, as an employee for a "law firm" should know better than anyone that federal and state laws take precidence over your wanting to ignore people's request for validation. No matter how you cut it verbal abuse on the phone in regards to collecting a debt is against federal law you are not immune. If you were half as smart as you like to believe you are then you would seek employment for someone who actually cares that there are laws and cares that some people simply can't pay. You should also look up the definition of professionalism. Making comments like you did and admitting to work there doesn't do anything but confirm the practices of your firm as being rude and obnoxious and probably illegal.


Submitted by on Mon, 07/27/2009 - 13:12

( Posts: 202330 | Credits: )


LET THEM TAKE YOU TO COURT!!!! TELL THE JUDGE YOU WILL SIGN A STIPULATION AT 50-100 PER MONTH AT 0% INTEREST AND THAT WILL FORGO A JUDGMENT AS LONG AS YOU PAY ON TIME...BUT BEWARE IF YOU ARE EVEN 1 DAY LATE THEY WILL ADD THE INTEREST TO THE ACCOUNT.


Submitted by on Fri, 08/07/2009 - 05:44

( Posts: 202330 | Credits: )


Anonymous #15, sometimes validation really is that -- VALIDATION. Sometimes collectors come after old debt which has been settled years in the past. Many collection agencies are just incompetent morons. If you can't validate the debt then it's clear to me that the debt is invalid.

Anonymous #19, it is DEFINITELY illegal to discuss debt with anyone other than the owner of the debt. You may contact third parties, but only to find out how to get in contact with the debtor, and only once. If your on the phone with the person and threatening to call neighbors then that is a violation of FEDERAL law.


Submitted by on Tue, 10/20/2009 - 06:45

( Posts: 202330 | Credits: )


Wow... wage garnishment is generally a last resort and is reserved for Student loans and child support... don't try to scare us with this extreme circumstance!!! And it is illegal to call back if I terminate the call, which the Scherr people do. I was a debt collector, so I am educated on this matter...


Submitted by on Thu, 11/05/2009 - 11:30

( Posts: 202330 | Credits: )


It is illegal to call neighbors... and if you are tired of people being upset about the economy and no jobs, it's probably because you didn't lose yours like the rest of us. If you are so "responsible" what the hell are you doing wasting your time on this site with the rest of us slackers... shouldn't you be at work??


Submitted by on Thu, 11/05/2009 - 11:35

( Posts: 202330 | Credits: )


My daughter has been receiving calls from Scherr Law for 3-4 months. She lives in California and we live in Ohio. It is always a canned message and no one is on the other end. When I call I get another canned message. We have no idea who we owe or what but continue to receive the same taped messages. I went on live and found there was no way to contact them by computer either. Interestingly there are several Scherrlaw.com and they are all different people in different states. Are they for real? My daughter belonged to Gold's Gym and we have had several run-ins about money she owes when in fact Urban Active states she is paid in full. They want more info since they think it is a scam and I am wondering if this law office is legit.


Submitted by on Sat, 11/21/2009 - 07:21

( Posts: 202330 | Credits: )


[QUOTE=Anonymous;491845]Wow... wage garnishment is generally a last resort and is reserved for Student loans and child support... don't try to scare us with this extreme circumstance!!![/QUOTE]


Dead wrong, I'm afraid. Garnishment can be used to enforce a civil judgement for almost any kind of debt. The kicker is that there must be a judgement in place first.

For some types of debt, student loans, child support, military out-of-service pay, and some other government debts, they don't need a judgement. They can proceed with an administrative garnishment without court action.


Submitted by unclewulf on Sat, 11/21/2009 - 08:04

unclewulf

( Posts: 3172 | Credits: )


Quote:

Originally Posted by Anonymous
My daughter has been receiving calls from Scherr Law for 3-4 months. She lives in California and we live in Ohio. It is always a canned message and no one is on the other end. When I call I get another canned message. We have no idea who we owe or what but continue to receive the same taped messages. I went on live and found there was no way to contact them by computer either. Interestingly there are several Scherrlaw.com and they are all different people in different states. Are they for real? My daughter belonged to Gold's Gym and we have had several run-ins about money she owes when in fact Urban Active states she is paid in full. They want more info since they think it is a scam and I am wondering if this law office is legit.



Send them a demand for validation, immediately. You may have to speakj to them in order to get an address. Search our site first, though. There's an amazing amount of information here. Including a lot of collector and law firm addresses.


Submitted by unclewulf on Sat, 11/21/2009 - 08:08

unclewulf

( Posts: 3172 | Credits: )


I ma not an attorney, once you are contacted by an attorney they have 5 days to send you a letter for stating they will have this validated for you you then have 30 days to repsond to that letter.google sample dispute letters.if has been arbitrated were those procedures fallowed-did you recive notice from claimant as well as arbitrator.Can the claimant proof he purchased the account. file a notice of hearing your self and meet them in court-most people do not they win by default-they should not be allowed to sit at theri office and collect thousands of dollars for free-make them meet you in court


Submitted by on Wed, 01/27/2010 - 06:56

( Posts: 202330 | Credits: )


I had a debt with this firm, and it was a valid debt that I had accumulated. They sent a summons for me to appear in court. I called them, and they set up a payment plan that I could afford. They immediately stopped adding interest to the debt. Several months in, my husband lost his job, and I couldn't make the payments. Once we got back on track and were both employed, I was able to resume the payments. The interest had resumed since I had skipped payments, but once I called them, they stopped the interest again. I now have one partial payment remaining, and this debt will be clear. I have never had anyone from there be rude to me. While some of the people here may have valid complaints, it sounds like some are trying to avoid paying a valid debt. If the debt is not valid, by all means fight it. But if it is a valid debt, call them and work something out. You'll feel so much better knowing you took care of the debt...and it will also help your credit score.


Submitted by on Tue, 03/09/2010 - 19:18

( Posts: 202330 | Credits: )


Quote:

Originally Posted by Anonymous
I had a debt with this firm, and it was a valid debt that I had accumulated. They sent a summons for me to appear in court. I called them, and they set up a payment plan that I could afford. They immediately stopped adding interest to the debt. Several months in, my husband lost his job, and I couldn't make the payments. Once we got back on track and were both employed, I was able to resume the payments. The interest had resumed since I had skipped payments, but once I called them, they stopped the interest again. I now have one partial payment remaining, and this debt will be clear. I have never had anyone from there be rude to me. While some of the people here may have valid complaints, it sounds like some are trying to avoid paying a valid debt. If the debt is not valid, by all means fight it. But if it is a valid debt, call them and work something out. You'll feel so much better knowing you took care of the debt...and it will also help your credit score.


i'm tickled you like dealing with bottomfeeders,but do not come on here and hint that people here are trying to get out of paying debt.it smacks of shill/humanoid.save your advice,this is a bottomfeeder bottom line.


Submitted by paulmergel on Wed, 03/10/2010 - 05:30

paulmergel

( Posts: 15514 | Credits: )


Quote:

Originally Posted by paulmergel
i'm tickled you like dealing with bottomfeeders,but do not come on here and hint that people here are trying to get out of paying debt.it smacks of shill/humanoid.save your advice,this is a bottomfeeder bottom line.


So you're telling me that not a single person this company deals with has a valid debt? That seems a bit far-fetched. And no, I don't like to deal with bottomfeeders; I'm just saying that this company has not been a problem for me to deal with...no one has been rude or overbearing with me. As I said in my original comment, if a debt is not valid, a person should certainly fight it. But I'd be willing to bet that SOME (notice I did NOT say ALL) of these folks have a valid debt that needs to be dealt with. Refusing to pay anything is not going to accomplish anything.

Here's my question for you: Suppose I am contacted by this company about a debt. I ask for validation of the debt, and they provide it, proving that it's a valid debt. What would be your advice to me in that circumstance?


Submitted by on Wed, 03/10/2010 - 11:01

( Posts: 202330 | Credits: )


Quote:

Originally Posted by Anonymous
So you're telling me that not a single person this company deals with has a valid debt? That seems a bit far-fetched. And no, I don't like to deal with bottomfeeders; I'm just saying that this company has not been a problem for me to deal with...no one has been rude or overbearing with me. As I said in my original comment, if a debt is not valid, a person should certainly fight it. But I'd be willing to bet that SOME (notice I did NOT say ALL) of these folks have a valid debt that needs to be dealt with. Refusing to pay anything is not going to accomplish anything.

Here's my question for you: Suppose I am contacted by this company about a debt. I ask for validation of the debt, and they provide it, proving that it's a valid debt. What would be your advice to me in that circumstance?


if a place sends by mail proof of not only the debt,but their right to collect(very important)then proceed,but nothing short of proof in writing is good enough.there are alot of scam collectors out there that have people's info that have no right to collect anything.again a place must prove they have legal license to collect as well.just a thought.again do not come on here with the "holier than thou attitude".i don't care for it.


Submitted by paulmergel on Wed, 03/10/2010 - 11:17

paulmergel

( Posts: 15514 | Credits: )


Quote:

Originally Posted by paulmergel
if a place sends by mail proof of not only the debt,but their right to collect(very important)then proceed,but nothing short of proof in writing is good enough.there are alot of scam collectors out there that have people's info that have no right to collect anything.again a place must prove they have legal license to collect as well.just a thought.again do not come on here with the "holier than thou attitude".i don't care for it.


Wow...do you attack everyone who comes on these boards who disagrees with you? I never said that I was better than anyone else. I was simply pointing out that not everyone has had a bad experience with this particularly collector. I also was pointing out that if a debt is valid, it's better to pay it than try to fight it (and there are people out there that fight valid debts just to try to get them reduced or eliminated). I also agreed with you that if you are not sure of the validity of a debt, it is certainly a good idea that you ask for validation of the debt and check out the agency trying to collect. I just think it is good advice to pay off any valid debts that you have; it's the right thing to do.

I have a bad feeling this post also will generate a negative comment from you. It seems no matter what I say or how politely I say it, you take issue with it. I was not trying to be nasty to anyone; just trying to offer a different perspective.


Submitted by on Thu, 03/11/2010 - 12:32

( Posts: 202330 | Credits: )


Quote:

Originally Posted by Anonymous
I had a debt with this firm, and it was a valid debt that I had accumulated. They sent a summons for me to appear in court. I called them, and they set up a payment plan that I could afford. They immediately stopped adding interest to the debt. Several months in, my husband lost his job, and I couldn't make the payments. Once we got back on track and were both employed, I was able to resume the payments. The interest had resumed since I had skipped payments, but once I called them, they stopped the interest again. I now have one partial payment remaining, and this debt will be clear. I have never had anyone from there be rude to me. While some of the people here may have valid complaints, it sounds like some are trying to avoid paying a valid debt. If the debt is not valid, by all means fight it. But if it is a valid debt, call them and work something out. You'll feel so much better knowing you took care of the debt...and it will also help your credit score.


re-read this and tell me you weren't implying that some people were looking to get out of paying a debt.that is what it looked like to me.btw if that is not your aim.prove me wrong,and that doesn't mean take shots.that is my sign that you meant to get on a soapbox.just saying.


Submitted by paulmergel on Thu, 03/11/2010 - 12:35

paulmergel

( Posts: 15514 | Credits: )


I have known people who fight a valid debt to try to get it reduced or not have to pay it at all. I'm sure you'd agree that there are people out there that do this. I was trying to say that if that's what anyone on this board is doing, they would be better served by paying their debts; perhaps I didn't clarify enough. However, I did NOT try to identify who was or wasn't doing that. I only know what they say in their posts, just as you do; we're only hearing their side of the story. I just think if someone has a VALID debt, trying to fight it can really backfire on them.

I am not trying to take shots at anyone. I have a lot of credit card debt that we got way behind on when we went to only one income. As a result, our credit rating is bad right now. We are working to rebuild it by paying off our debts, not hiding from them. I have one payment remaining with the Scherr law firm, and it will be such a relief to have the debt taken care of. I just think if anyone is trying to hide from their debt, it would be better for them to face it now instead of delaying the inevitable.


Submitted by on Thu, 03/11/2010 - 13:22

( Posts: 202330 | Credits: )


Quote:

Originally Posted by Anonymous
I have known people who fight a valid debt to try to get it reduced or not have to pay it at all. I'm sure you'd agree that there are people out there that do this. I was trying to say that if that's what anyone on this board is doing, they would be better served by paying their debts; perhaps I didn't clarify enough. However, I did NOT try to identify who was or wasn't doing that. I only know what they say in their posts, just as you do; we're only hearing their side of the story. I just think if someone has a VALID debt, trying to fight it can really backfire on them.

I am not trying to take shots at anyone. I have a lot of credit card debt that we got way behind on when we went to only one income. As a result, our credit rating is bad right now. We are working to rebuild it by paying off our debts, not hiding from them. I have one payment remaining with the Scherr law firm, and it will be such a relief to have the debt taken care of. I just think if anyone is trying to hide from their debt, it would be better for them to face it now instead of delaying the inevitable.


i agree totally.heck i have had no problems with collectors that others call bottomfeeders.so yes i have been given validation as well,and paid.there are two sides of each issue,and i agree with you when you put it this way.


Submitted by paulmergel on Thu, 03/11/2010 - 14:05

paulmergel

( Posts: 15514 | Credits: )


STAY AWAY FROM THIS FIRM. They are not here to help the consumer. My parents are up in age (70's) and they had a balace of $8,000 on their credit card. They received a letter staying they would accept a full payment of $3200 and the account would be paid and their record would should paid as agree. For almost 3 years they were making shedule payments on their limited income and took advantage to pay the $3200. On their credit record it DOES NOT show paid as agree it shows COLLECTIONS...and this year when they filed for their income tax they normally get $400...this year they got $45...why because they paid off the $3200 and this law firm showed it as earn income. What can 2 senior citizen aged over 70 do with $45 dollars...can't buy 1 medication that's for sure...not even the light bill...so maybe the law firm would like their $45 as well.People call the creditors...tell them your situation and if they are willing to help and arrange payments...don't use Harold Sheer...aside from sticking it to the elderly...their so call collectors are rude...they threaten people...by telling my mother if she doesn't pay they are going to call the police to get her "arrested"...I would have love to see that...I should forward all my mother's medical bills...sicne that call she's been popping pills just to face the outside world...the phone rings and she cries...Harold Sheer "destroyed" my mother...thank you Harold Sheer...at least you and your people are sleeping well at night...


Submitted by on Mon, 03/07/2011 - 07:30

( Posts: 202330 | Credits: )


Listen you're so dumb , maybe you should've taken care of this the 7 months the original creditor gave you in the beginning before it was sold to a third party. You had asked for this, you had the opportunity to settle before and you knew what was coming if you don't pay your credit card so you asked for this. You borrowed the money, now do the right thing and pay it back!! You're stealing money....and should be put in jail for grand larceny.


Submitted by on Fri, 03/11/2011 - 11:52

( Posts: 202330 | Credits: )


#40 you are rude and dumb yourself. First off you should read the post before you start barking like a little annoying yappy dog. Or CAN you read? They were MAKING payments for those months!! Oh and they should be put in jail for threatening a little old lady that if she did not pay the debt she would be arrested, THAT is illegal...oh and FYI you loser, not paying a debt is NOT grand larceny.

#38 what sounds like what happened is that since the settlement was not the total amount of the debt, the remainder got counted as income..that is standard practice unfortunately. You can fight what is reported on the credit reports as it should state 'settled' or 'settled for less than full amount' and should be closed and have a zero balance, ESPECIALLY since the IRS offset the remainder...the debt is gone now.


Submitted by goldenbast on Fri, 03/11/2011 - 12:30

goldenbast

( Posts: 2884 | Credits: )


Oh and just because I have to have my say....I agree with both Paul and anonymous. We always advocate asking for validation. The sad fact is that these bottomfeeder debt collectors make it bad for the lawful ones. Remember, these statutes were enacted because the industry is rife with unethical collectors who make it a routine day to collect illegally. Unfortunately some of the really bad ones will attempt to collect on debt they don't even rightly own! I know I am not the only one who has had two collection agencies both telling me I owe them for the SAME debt! And the crazy thing, neither one could validate the debt at all...not even a single statement-nothing.

We always say that if the validation comes through and is proper (and no, we don't advocate that long laundry list debt validation letter-that letter is a menace) then you should set up payment arrangements! We do however advocate not sacrificing your life (home, utilities, food). Unfortunately some companies refuse to accept any kind of reasonable payment arrangement and force the issue to be sued because all they care about is the money....and even then the judge will set up a payment arrangement, sometimes lower than what the debtor originally offered!!!

One thing people need to remember when they are screaming about 'pay your bills' is that these debt purchaser companies knowingly buy these old debt, some of them outside the SOL.....they also buy them for pennies on the dollar....and it really chaps my hide when these primate losers come on this forum and scream about you stealing from the poor little debt purchasers.....nobody stole anything from them. They bought old (sometimes out of SOL) debt KNOWING these people defaulted and then not only do they try to get the whole amount of the debt (that they paid pennies on the dollar for) and then try to tack on collection fees and whatnot.


Submitted by goldenbast on Fri, 03/11/2011 - 12:40

goldenbast

( Posts: 2884 | Credits: )