Debtconsolidationcare.com - the USA consumer forum

I sent a DV in December-No response, but still on credit rep

Date: Fri, 03/14/2008 - 05:54

Submitted by anonymous
on Fri, 03/14/2008 - 05:54

Posts: 202330 Credits: [Donate]

Total Replies: 8


I wrote a thread back in december. My husband rec'd a legal looking letter from a law firm, stating we owe something like 5000. to Home Depot.
I sent them a DV, and I have heard NOTHING, not a thing back from them. I figured they'd send me at least a copy of bills, or credit app that must have been filled out, right?

I got nothing at all. So I decided to check our credit reports, and there's the debt, still an open file, and that ruins our credit. I haven't a clue where to go next on this-my husband is disabled, may be able to go back to work by the end of the year, but for now, we have no money coming in, and cannot afford a lawyer, or anything else for that matter.

What do I do to restore credit, and/or get this off our reports-does the fact that they never responded mean it's an invalid debt, or that the statue is up?

I am so confused!!


hi Brooke, welcome!

OK, this one's actually not that difficult, at least it shouldnt be.

First, is the lawfirm that sent you the letter the same company that has reported the debt on the credit report? If not, then you are dealing with two different companies. If so, then your job just got easier.

Let me know that answer, and I can run you right through the process to fix their wagon. What you have here is more than just something hurting your credit--they could potentially owe you money for violating federal law. But we need some more details first....I also need to know if your debt validation request was sent out through the regular mail or if you sent it by certified mail. You always want to use certified mail when dealing with any collection issue, because a lot of these companies will look a judge in the eye and say "we never received any such request" when they know they did. Sending it certified will provide a record of the letter being received by them.

Get back to me and we can wrap this up for you.

Jon


lrhall41

Submitted by skydivr7673 on Fri, 03/14/2008 - 12:39

( Posts: 2036 | Credits: )


Thanks for the reply!
I sent it certified, and have the reciept from them-the original debt is Home Depot, and they apparently sold it, or hired, a law frim in my state to collect it.
I receieved what looked like legal papers, and in my distress sent out a dv letter to both, home depot, and the law frim-and have both reciepts!
I expected them to seek a judgement, because that's what the papaers stated, but I have heard nothing-at all!
The bill is in my husbands name, if it was a real debt, it would have to be years and years old. I cannot remember ever having a home depot credit card, and he is normally very on top of bill paying.
I checked our credit history, and aside from some very recent late payments (because he's temporarily disabled so, we juggle to pay bills) there's only this enormous amount, saying "in collection"
What do I do?
So frustrating and upsetting!

Thanks again!


lrhall41

Submitted by on Sun, 03/16/2008 - 06:06

( Posts: | Credits: )


About these 'legal-looking' papers... Have you contacted the court in question, to see if there's actually a case filed against you? I think I'd start there. FWIW, it's illegal for a CA to use any forms that would lead the 'least sophisticated consumer' to think they're from a court, if they aren't actually from a court.

As to the credit reports... You've sent them a DV letter, and have proof that they got it. Now dispute the tradeline with the CB. The collectors have to provide validation before they can continue to report it. That may get it off the report, although you may have to threaten legal action to do it. Be aware that if they do validate, that tradeline may well come right back.


lrhall41

Submitted by unclewulf on Sun, 03/16/2008 - 06:52

( Posts: 3172 | Credits: )


The 30 day limit really is for Texas and another state or two. As long as a CA does not actively collect, they can wait forever. That is why Wulf suggested to dispute now with the credit reporting agencies because the FTC has made the opinion (and it is backed up with case law now) that verifying an account with the CRA is considered a collection attempt and that is where you get a definate violation you can use to see some action.

Be aware that some will just be difficult no matter what you do. These are the ones you may have to take to court to see any results.


lrhall41

Submitted by goldenbast on Sun, 03/16/2008 - 08:42

( Posts: 2884 | Credits: )