index page

Request to revise?

Date: Tue, 09/14/2010 - 18:28
Submitted by on Tue, 09/14/2010 - 18:28
Posts: 202330
Credits:
[Donate]

I sent my answer and special defences back to the attorney and the court house. I looked on the courts website today and noticed that the attorney for the plaintiff is requesting to revise? What does that mean? I haven't received anything yet. I am so nervous I have never been sued and I am taking every step one at a time. I just like being a head of the game. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks :-)


[LEFT]I think your answer to their complaint likely constituted the "request to revise."[/LEFT]

[LEFT]In Connecticut:

[/LEFT]

[LEFT][FONT=Arial][SIZE=2]Sec. 10-35. Request to Revise
[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial][SIZE=2]Whenever any party desires to obtain (1) a more complete or particular statement of the allegations of an adverse party’s pleading, or (2) the deletion of any unnecessary, repetitious, scandalous, impertinent, immaterial or otherwise improper allegations in an adverse party’s pleading, or (3) separation of causes of action which may be united in one complaint when they are improperly combined in one count, or the separation of two or more grounds of defense improperly combined in one defense, or (4) any other appropriate correction in an adverse party’s pleading, the party desiring any such amendment in an adverse party’s pleading may file a timely request to revise that pleading.

[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial][SIZE=1](P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. 147.)

[/SIZE][/FONT][/LEFT]
[FONT=Arial][SIZE=1]
[LEFT][/SIZE][/FONT][FONT=Arial][SIZE=2]Sec. 10-36. —Reasons in Request to Revise
[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial][SIZE=2][FONT=Arial][SIZE=2]The request to revise shall set forth, for each requested revision, the portion of the pleading sought to be revised, the requested revision, and the reasons therefor, followed by sufficient space in which the party to whom the request is directed can insert an objection and reasons [FONT=Arial][SIZE=2]therefor. [/SIZE][/FONT][FONT=Arial][SIZE=1](P.B. 1978-1997, Sec. 148.)[/SIZE][/FONT][FONT=Arial][SIZE=1][/LEFT]
[/SIZE][/FONT][/SIZE][/FONT][/SIZE][/FONT]


Submitted by OhioGal1 on Mon, 09/20/2010 - 06:46

OhioGal1

( Posts: 5253 | Credits: )


Thanks, I read the rule and I am just angry because they want me to delete or object the revision. I will delete some but not all of them. I definetly am not going to delete the statue of limitions. She said she had a copy of a statement that said I paid in 2005 which is well within the 6 year statute. I think she meant 2004, which is out of statue.

Thanks for responding, I appreciate it :-)


Submitted by on Mon, 09/20/2010 - 15:59

( Posts: 202330 | Credits: )