Another letter from Corporate Receivables
Date: Thu, 02/04/2010 - 11:51
P.S. Corporate Receivables never validated my debt or responded to my request for debt validation.
I would send them a follow-up letter including my original lette
I would send them a follow-up letter including my original letter and proof of delivery. Let them keep racking up FDCPA violations. I'd also check my credit report for any derogatory information reported, and if there is, dispute that.
Either way, you're well on your way to cashing in on a nice summer vacation at their expense.
since you sent proper validation,and this is how they respond.i
since you sent proper validation,and this is how they respond.i wouldn't wait.go to NACA.NET.find a consumer attorney in your area and sue this bottomfeeder.i like the angle mr.x,but the most the OP will get is 1,000.00.sue them now as nathan has proof right now.this is a collector that doesn't play fair,and needs to be taught a hard lesson.
Thank you
Thanks for the info. I'll go ahead and send out another letter along with the original and proof of them receiving the letter. I'll also check out that website and see what I can do. I know these people like to play hardball and unfairly. Let's just hope for the best. Any more advice and whatnot would be greatly appreciated. Thanks again!
PaulMergel - I enjoy reading yoru posts on this board and apprec
PaulMergel - I enjoy reading yoru posts on this board and appreciate your input in the community.
From my experience, although the $1k statutory damage limit under the FDCPA appears to be a cap, I have repeatedly been able to recover actual damages as well without proof of medical treatment. From my perspective, the more egregious the behavior the more actual damages a CA will settle for. Long story short, I like to capture as many violations as possible in order to claim more actual damages above and beyond the $1k statutory damages.
Quote:Originally Posted by AnonymousPaulMergel - I enjoy reading
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anonymous PaulMergel - I enjoy reading yoru posts on this board and appreciate your input in the community. From my experience, although the $1k statutory damage limit under the FDCPA appears to be a cap, I have repeatedly been able to recover actual damages as well without proof of medical treatment. From my perspective, the more egregious the behavior the more actual damages a CA will settle for. Long story short, I like to capture as many violations as possible in order to claim more actual damages above and beyond the $1k statutory damages. |
point taken,but it could also be the lawyer the OP finds in his area.some just might recommend letting the illegalities pile up,while some might bring up the 1,000.00.i do think getting a consultation would be beneficial just to give nathan some clarity on which avenue he should take.i do think we agree on this.the bottomfeeder should be sued.it's a matter of when not if.
Quote:Originally Posted by paulmergelpoint taken,but it could al
Quote:
Originally Posted by paulmergel point taken,but it could also be the lawyer the OP finds in his area.some just might recommend letting the illegalities pile up,while some might bring up the 1,000.00.i do think getting a consultation would be beneficial just to give nathan some clarity on which avenue he should take.i do think we agree on this.the bottomfeeder should be sued.it's a matter of when not if. |
Agreed.