Remember Paying an old debt/ collection starts the 7yrs over
Date: Fri, 11/09/2007 - 03:51
Submitted by Mary Adkins Matthews
on
Fri, 11/09/2007 - 03:51
Total Replies: 1
Before paying on an old debt/ collection , remember this .... be careful !
Does paying off liens & collections improve my credit?
In the long run yes, but in the short term it doesn’t have much of an effect at all, unless the amounts have a balance listed in the “past due†section of the report. In that case I suggest to pay the balance in the past due column if it is less than two years old, but remember; whenever you make a payment on a collection or a charge off, the seven year clock starts all over again and the item will be reported for seven more years from the date of payment. If you never pay a collection then it will disappear seven years after the time you last made payment on the credit card/ debt that resulted in the collection.
Does paying off liens & collections improve my credit?
In the long run yes, but in the short term it doesn’t have much of an effect at all, unless the amounts have a balance listed in the “past due†section of the report. In that case I suggest to pay the balance in the past due column if it is less than two years old, but remember; whenever you make a payment on a collection or a charge off, the seven year clock starts all over again and the item will be reported for seven more years from the date of payment. If you never pay a collection then it will disappear seven years after the time you last made payment on the credit card/ debt that resulted in the collection.
I am sorry to do this to you mca but your info is wrong and I wi
I am sorry to do this to you mca but your info is wrong and I will list the relevant section of the FCRA for my proof.The only way to reset the clock is with a adjustment of account by original creditor under current FDIC rules bringing account open and current.
This info is taken from the FTC website and is using the FCRA as the controlling statute.
Quote:
FCRA Staff Opinion: Brinckerhoff-Amason http://www.ftc.gov/os/statutes/fcra/amason.shtm 1 of 2 8/25/2007 6:24 AM Federal Trade Commission Protecting America's Consumers Ms. Alaina K. Amason 14155 Shire Oak San Antonio, TX 78247 Dear Ms. Amason: This responds to your letter concerning the time limitations imposed by the Fair Credit Reporting Act ("FCRA") on the reporting of chargeoff accounts by a consumer reporting agency ("CRA," usually a credit bureau). We list your inquiries on this topic below in italics, with our replies immediately following each item. 1. What reporting limits does the FCRA provide with respect to chargeoffs, and how long have they been in effect? Section 605(a)(4), which has been in effect since the FCRA became effective in April 1971, has always prohibited CRAs from reporting chargeoffs that are more than seven years old.(1) Section 623(a)(5), which became law in September 1997, requires a creditor that reports a chargeoff to a CRA to notify the agency (within 90 days of reporting the account) of "the month and year of the commencement of the delinquency that immediately preceded" the chargeoff. Section 605(c)(1) provides that the seven year period begins 180 days from that date. Both provisions were part of the major revision to the FCRA that were enacted in 1996.(2) 2. Is the reporting period extended if (A) the original creditor sells or transfers the account to another creditor, (B) the consumer responds to post-chargeoff collection efforts by making a payment on the debt, or (C) the consumer disputes the account with a CRA? Does it matter whether the 7-year period has expired when any of these events occurs? No. In enacting the new provisions discussed above, Congress intended to establish a date certain -- 180 days after the start of the delinquency that led to the chargeoff -- to begin the obsolescence period. It did so to correct the often lengthy extension of the period that resulted from later events under the original FCRA. Enclosed are two staff opinion letters (Kosmerl, 06/04/99; Johnson, 08/31/98) that discuss the impact of these provisions, and the legislative history relating to their enactment, in more detail. Because the commencement of the seven year period is now described with some precision by the statute, it is our opinion that none of the subsequent events you listed -- sale of the charged off account by the creditor, or a payment on or dispute about the account by the consumer -- changes the allowable period for a CRA to report a chargeoff. 3. Since Sections 623(a)(5) and 605(c)(1) provide new rules for calculating the 7-year period that became effective in 1997, do chargeoff accounts now have different obsolescence periods depending on when the chargeoff occurred? Yes. Section 605(c)(2) states that the section "shall apply only to items of information added to the (CRA) file of a consumer on or after" 455 days after enactment, or December 29, 1997. Therefore, a chargeoff reported to a CRA on or after that date is subject to the new commencement-of-the-delinquency method of calculating the obsolescence period set forth in Sections 623(a)(5) and 605(c)(1). On the other hand, a chargeoff reported to a CRA before December 29, 1997, is not covered by the new provisions, as discussed in one of the enclosed letters (Kosmerl, 06/04/99). If a credit account was reported as a chargeoff before that date, the Commission's view has been that it can be reported for seven years from the date the creditor actually charged it off.(3) The opinions set forth in this informal staff letter are not binding on the Commission. Sincerely yours, Clarke W. Brinckerhoff 1. Section 605(b) provides that there is no time limit applicable to a report made in connection with credit involving a principal amount (or insurance with a face amount) of $150,000 or more, or employment for a salary of $75,000 or more. Prior to September 1997, those amounts were $50,000 and $20,000, respectively. 2. The Consumer Credit Reporting Reform Act of 1996 (Title II, Subchapter D, of Public Law 104-280, signed into law on September 30, 1996), made many other changes to the FCRA. Division of Financial Practices Clarke W. Brinckerhoff Attorney 202-326-3224 February 15, 2000 |
