logo

Debtconsolidationcare.com - the USA consumer forum

Email or snail mail...or both?

Date: Mon, 11/09/2009 - 08:19

Submitted by Icon
on Mon, 11/09/2009 - 08:19

Posts: 185 Credits: [Donate]

Total Replies: 6


I've emailed all of my PDLs, but I'm also considering following up with snail mail (sent certified, return receipt and all that jazz) that will be copied to the FTC and the Attorney General for my state (NY). Is this overkill? I've seen that some people here have done both or one or the other.


well it depends.with e-mail they can still claim they never received it.with CMRRR and snail mail once they sign for it they can't deny never getting it.some have had success with e-mail.it's your choice.i would wait and see how they respond to the e-mails before following up with the snail mail.


lrhall41

Submitted by paulmergel on Mon, 11/09/2009 - 08:35

( Posts: 15514 | Credits: )


Send them an e-mail demanding all future communication take place via snail mail. Send it to their address if you have it as well. This is not an unreasonable request, as e-mails such as ones sent by PDL companies are often flagged as spam by filtering algorithms. This demand serves the purpose of forcing the PDL company to play the role of a legit company. snail mail communication = the company's request for usurist interest, doing business without a license, potential racketeering (in the case of companies "backed by a bank") becomes documented.


lrhall41

Submitted by on Mon, 11/09/2009 - 23:45

( Posts: | Credits: )