logo

Debtconsolidationcare.com - the USA consumer forum

MTE and USFastCash

Date: Fri, 04/25/2008 - 13:53

Submitted by llw1995
on Fri, 04/25/2008 - 13:53

Posts: 1422 Credits: [Donate]

Total Replies: 21


Just for clarification, USFastCash is not part of MTE Financial Services. I just received this email from them. I am not sure if anyone believes that they are connected but apparently, they are not.

MTE FINANCIAL SERVICES

FAX: 866-668-0535

Email: compliancedepartment (@) mtefs.com
uuu
April 24, 2008









RE: Your Complaint




We have reviewed the complaint forwarded to our company regarding "US Fast Cash." We have no affiliation with that company. We searched our entire database for good measure and were not able to find a match for your name or email address. Please direct your complaint to the appropriate company. We will consider this matter closed unless we hear from you.

Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter.

Respectfully,

Compliance Department

CC/file


that is an absolute lie.them and ameriloan are in the same building for crying out loud.they will say that about alot of there d/b/a's.do not believe it my friend.


lrhall41

Submitted by paulmergel on Fri, 04/25/2008 - 13:57

( Posts: 15514 | Credits: )


This is from a Cease and Desist order from CA:

Enforcement Actions: Civil Actions, Desist & Refrain OrdersCase Number: Los Angeles Case #: BC37336

Date of Initial Action: 06/29/07

Defendants/Respondents: ameriloan, a business organization, form unknown; AMERILOAN, a corporation; AMERILOAN, a limited liability company; AMERILOAN, a partnership; US FAST CASH, a business organization, form unknown; US FAST CASH, a corporation; US FAST CASH, a limited liability company; US FAST CASH, a partnership; ONE CLICK CASH, a business organization, form unknown; ONE CLICK CASH, a corporation; ONE CLICK CASH, a limited liability company; ONE CLICK CASH, a partnership; UNITED CASH LOANS, a business organization, form unknown; UNITED CASH LOANS, a corporation, UNITED CASH LOANS, a limited liability company; UNITED CASH LOANS, a partnership; PREFERRED CASH LOANS, a business organization, form unknown; PREFERRED CASH LOANS, a corporation; PREFERRED CASH LOANS, a limited liability company; PREFERRED CASH LOANS, a partnership; INTERNET CASH ADVANCE MARKETING, INC., a corporation


They do a seperate Cease and Desist order for each company . . . . They would not list all those names unless it could be proven.

It's really not a belief, it's a fact . . . . Do a corporation search before you believe what the pdl's say . . . . You will see each name is owned by the same parent company.


lrhall41

Submitted by goudah2424 on Fri, 04/25/2008 - 14:21

( Posts: 7935 | Credits: )


llw,what is your point?i am not going to sit by and let you do this.if you want to believe an illegal pdl's lies fine,but goudah bought the proof to refute you.i don't want others to see this and think that those two companies are not MTE, they are.


lrhall41

Submitted by paulmergel on Fri, 04/25/2008 - 14:33

( Posts: 15514 | Credits: )


my point is simply this. Whether or not MTE is affiliated with UsFastCash or ameriloan is a moot point. They have clearly indicated that they have NO intention of doing anything regarding UFC so why argue about it? It's a personal belief, if you will. The C and D order from CA lists several PDLs but shows no connection to any parent company, or at least the part listed doesn't. Why get huffy with me? I was just stating an opinion based on what I had. If I am proven wrong, I will be the first to admit it. Meanwhile, like I said, it's moot. Topic closed.


lrhall41

Submitted by on Fri, 04/25/2008 - 16:06

( Posts: | Credits: )


We already know that most internet PDLs operate illegaly, and when they are called on it, they are known to lie.

If these companies lie about the laws, lie about the licenses they have or don't have, and lie about being able to put you in jail and have police yank you out of your cubicle and drag you into their paddy wagon and cart you off to jail, is it so hard to believe that they would lie about their affiliations?

Just because an illegal PDL company sends you an email saying they aren't affiliated with USFash Cash, does that make it undeniably true? Do you know how easy it is to lie about identity? Especially on the internet? I could easily say I am or am not somebody via the anonymous cyberspace. For all you know, I'm Britney Spears, and I'm just too embarassed to use my real name on a debt forum.

Really- why choose to believe in a PDL? It's not a religion. It's not Santa Claus or choosing to believe there are unicorns. This is truly one of the strangest things I have heard in a long time.

If you choose to believe they are not affiliated, then really, you are making the choice to be in denial, and nothing more.


lrhall41

Submitted by Amaranth on Fri, 04/25/2008 - 18:37

( Posts: 271 | Credits: )


Again, I will say, I am not in denial, I really don't care if they are lying or not. They have no plans to do anything about it so it's a moot point in my mind, whether they are affiliated or not. I wasn't the one who made a big deal of it. I made a statement, voiced my opinion and I have been jumped on for speaking my mind. But, thanks for the input.


lrhall41

Submitted by llw1995 on Fri, 04/25/2008 - 18:45

( Posts: 1422 | Credits: )


If it was nothing but a moot point whether or not they were affiliated, then why create and start a topic about it? Apparently, you wanted people to see what you had to say. Surely your only reason for doing that was to get feedback, which you did, and now "it's a big deal".

If you don't want people rebutting your opinions, then you are better off not sharing them. Otherwise, you need to be prepared to defend them rather than get upset that people disagree with you.


lrhall41

Submitted by Amaranth on Fri, 04/25/2008 - 18:50

( Posts: 271 | Credits: )


To answer your questions, yes, I do know how easy it is to be something you aren't on the internet, but I try never to do that. And yes, I did think I had something worth saying by passing along the info I had received from MTE. And no, I never thought it was a big deal. It was just a post. As for rebuttals, I don't have a problem with them. They are a healthy way of provoking ways of thinking on a particular subject. If we all had the same opinions and beliefs it would be a pretty boring world. However, I do have a problem with the delivery and tone of them. Please go back and re-read the rebuttals and I think you will see how biting they are. I have gained a wealth of information from this board. . . some good, some bad and some indifferent. I have taken what I felt was important from them and used that knowledge to help me solve my PDL problems. I don't always agree with everything that was being said, but I respected it and the person who thought it was important enough to bring it to the forum. That's the appropriate way to deal with other people's opinions. As for sharing, you are absolutely right. . . sometimes opinions are better left to one's own self. Defending opinions is only necessary when dignifying the situation which created them. I will continue to use this forum to educate myself and others on the horrors of PDLs but my opinions will remain my own.


lrhall41

Submitted by llw1995 on Fri, 04/25/2008 - 20:15

( Posts: 1422 | Credits: )


My bank statement has multiple ACH debits by MTE. Well, used to have! Back when I had to obsess over my checking account and be up all night trying to create new mathematical equations whereby my paycheck would cover all my pending ACH debits and was trying to figure where all my loans were from by reviewing my previous bank statement, it was difficult to determine due to the multiple debits from MTE (because more than one of my loans were through them.)


lrhall41

Submitted by on Sat, 04/26/2008 - 03:04

( Posts: | Credits: )


With a Desist and Refrain order, and an actual Civil Action with a Temporary Restraining Order, both in CA...I have an unpaid loan to US Fast Cash and ameriloan...with these legal documents filed in my state of CA, do I have to repay them?


lrhall41

Submitted by on Mon, 09/29/2008 - 18:52

( Posts: | Credits: )