US Fast Cash

this bottomfeeder is illegal in every way.if you've paid back what you borrowed in rollovers and fees.you owe them nothing more.they will of course think and state otherwise,but they are totally illegal and can do nothing to you but call.

ok so what do i tell the lady when she calls back

Hi rmarmer,

Do you have the letter you sent out saved on your computer? I would ignore the call's and sent an email to the address I will list below. If you continue to answer their call's they will try to bully money out of you. Send them an email everytime they call, it may not stop the call's all together, but it might make you feel a little better. Have you reported them to the BBB yet?
Quote:

that is what i did with them.e-mail after e-mail.

I have the letter. I just sent them an e-mail. Hope it works.

they will fight you.just be aware of that.they think they can bully and threaten.just hang up if they call and keep sending the e-mail.file AG complaints as well.

Thanks Guy's The phone calls just started today. What about oneclickcash? How are they??

they are MTE as well.how much if anything do you owe them?

i don't owe them anything i had previous loans i paid in full. i paid more on this one than what i owe.

then tell them that,and hang up.file an AG complaint against this bottomfeeder pdl too.

I am a lawyer in the state of Pa and I hate to tell you but these companys are perfectly legal, read your contract it a rip off but it is legal.

Stephen, I too am a lawyer in the Commonwealth of PA. US Fast Cash's contract violates the CDCA (as the company is not licensed in any jurisdiction) and LIPL (as the interest exceeds the 6% annual cap permitted on loans by unlicensed lenders). I would also point out that US Fast Cash is operated by CLK Management, which settled a federal lawsuit earlier this year in the Western District of PA (Lee v. CLK Management, LLC) that was based on the same loan agreement you describe as "legal" and which is used by each of CLK's six lending companies ("-ies" not "-ys", Counselor) which you describe as "perfectly legal."

Perhaps you were absent the day they taught LAW in law school?

One error in my previous post. The Pennsylvania case was WALP v CLK Management. Lee is a more recent case in Kansas in which a couple of former collectors are suing CLK for unpaid overtime.