logo

Debtconsolidationcare.com - the USA consumer forum

has anybody ever tried this

Date: Thu, 04/19/2007 - 09:33

Submitted by perry968
on Thu, 04/19/2007 - 09:33

Posts: 234 Credits: [Donate]

Total Replies: 26


for craps and giggles i want to call bass and assicates or whatever they call themselfs this week and ask them if ellis crosby around and see what they say.. before i do this has anybody ever called bass or the other names he used and asked if ellis crosby there?


The problem is that the people who answer the phones there aren't even aware of the connection to Ellis Crosby. It's not the same staff. We've been over this numerous times. The people who ran Ellis Crosby do not run Bass. TECHNICALLY SPEAKING ANYWAY. The connection is that the other two guys who owned/ran Ellis Crosby's firm have funded Bass and Associates and trained David Jacobs and other execs how to run Bass.

They are operating out of the same manual. They have the same clients. They use the same procedures. And, eventually, they will go down just like Ellis Crosby did.

I don't know if my post on David Jacobs was deleted or not, but let's just say that this man is in serious hot water. He's being investigated by the Florida AG, the Jacksonville County DA's Office, the State Bar of Florida (for unauthorized practice of law), and supposedly the U.S. Attorney/FBI. This is why you have seen Bass recently spring up a couple of new DBAs -- Phillip Jackson and Associates and Mark Watson and Associates. The writing is on the wall.


lrhall41

Submitted by on Thu, 04/19/2007 - 10:00

( Posts: | Credits: )


Hi Doug Danger, welcome back to the forums!

Quote:

He's being investigated by the Florida AG, the Jacksonville County DA's Office, the State Bar of Florida (for unauthorized practice of law), and supposedly the U.S. Attorney/FBI. This is why you have seen Bass recently spring up a couple of new DBAs -- Phillip Jackson and Associates and Mark Watson and Associates. The writing is on the wall.


Do you have any links you could provide so we can further read about this? I'm sure the more information that is available, the more it could help someone who is having current run-ins with Bass.

Regards
Mike


lrhall41

Submitted by Teleport on Thu, 04/19/2007 - 10:21

( Posts: 1388 | Credits: )


I'm assuming that since it's under investigation, there are no published links at this point. I can say first hand having seen a State Bar investigation, that such information would not be public unless charges were filed. You'd think it is the same with the FBI, DA and AG, but that's beyond my knowledge.

My knowledge of the situation comes from a former Bass Exec, who was involved in the IT department. He did not start the company; he came there shortly after they fired their first IT guy. He left the company a bout 4-6 weeks ago due to some absurd conduct by David Jacobs. A lot of the other management team members have left too; mostly because of Mr. Jacobs.


lrhall41

Submitted by on Thu, 04/19/2007 - 10:29

( Posts: | Credits: )


If they feel the need to delete it, so be it. I still come here on a daily basis. I generally don't feel the need to post because it's become quite apparent that anything even semi-controversial will be deleted, so why bother? I was just talking with my friend formerly of Bass this morning, so I felt like responding.


lrhall41

Submitted by on Thu, 04/19/2007 - 10:32

( Posts: | Credits: )


I was being sarcastic. Of course this is DD.

When have I ever used racial slurs? I called cajun bulldog a removed. But anyone who knows a real cajun, knows that removed is more of a term of endearment than anything. Other than that, I haven't used racial slurs.


lrhall41

Submitted by on Thu, 04/19/2007 - 10:40

( Posts: | Credits: )


I'm assuming that since this former exec is sharing information to you, that it's public record, and you wouldn't mind sharing their name.

Only reason I inquired to more information, is because the forums have had trouble in the past where a member would say one thing, and it totally not be valid. When a company sees this, they can accuse the member of slander.

If they are under investigation, great. The more companies that violate the law, the more we need the consumers to be aware. If you have information, please provide it.

What is the former Bass Executives name? If you're friends with this person perhaps they could share more information since it's obviously not confidential (seeing how he already told you about the contracts).

Regards
Mike


lrhall41

Submitted by Teleport on Thu, 04/19/2007 - 10:46

( Posts: 1388 | Credits: )


Re: the linked post.

That's not me. Probably all the proof you need is that I haven't even been using a proxy server recently because I'm no longer involved in criminal activity. Yet, I have been able to use this site without incident for a while now. If my IP were banned as stated in the thread, I wouldn't be able to post this.

More importantly, why was removed deleted? removed is derogatory if used against blacks. If you yelled at someone from La. and called them a removed, I suppose that is derogatory as well. But just calling someone a removed. Jesus God Almighty -- it's not a slur.


lrhall41

Submitted by on Thu, 04/19/2007 - 10:51

( Posts: | Credits: )


Quote:

Probably all the proof you need is that I haven't even been using a proxy server recently because I'm no longer involved in criminal activity.

All i can say is ??!?!?!

That term that you speak of, is something that some cajun people refer to themselves as and are proud of it, as baffling as it is....


lrhall41

Submitted by sswett on Thu, 04/19/2007 - 10:53

( Posts: 408 | Credits: )


For slander purposes, the best thing would be if I couched everything as "allegedly." In other words, if I went and re-wrote that post and said Bass allegedly this, David Jacobs allegedly that, it is not actionable as slander. Furthermore, even if you don't say "allegedly" truth is a defense to slander charges. I think your point, which is valid though, is how do we know it's true.

If it makes you feel better, the person I am talking about is Aaron Lansing. I don't really know how that would help this site on slander charges, but whatever. If David Jacobs were to come on here, he'd be able to identify that info I posted as coming from Aaron even without his name.


lrhall41

Submitted by on Thu, 04/19/2007 - 10:56

( Posts: | Credits: )


Re: criminal activity.

i quit my job working for the bookmaking syndicate because there was an incident that happened that scared the ever-loving crap out of me. i guess i'm not really that tough after all.

so, i'm looking for work in chicago and seattle and hoping to either find a good job here or find any job in seattle and move back in with my wife and kids.


lrhall41

Submitted by on Thu, 04/19/2007 - 11:03

( Posts: | Credits: )


Doug Danger is full of it. Period. His source is made up. His story is also fabricated. Look everyone, I know you all hate these clowns and would like nothing more than to hear some good stuff on them. But he is feeding you BS. And I am caliing him on it. He is taking you all on a ride!


lrhall41

Submitted by on Thu, 04/26/2007 - 12:17

( Posts: | Credits: )