NES

Date: Tue, 11/11/2008 - 16:10

Submitted by anonymous
on Tue, 11/11/2008 - 16:10

Posts: 202330 Credits: [Donate]

Total Replies: 4

i am handling my debt with CNI, a debt settlement company. they have been great so far. i am, of course, still having problems with some of the CA. i was put in contact with an attorney through CNI and UCAN and have successfully sued one of the companies that was violating the fdcpa. my husband is having problems with the CA, NES. they have called his work many times and threatened him with a felony credit card fraud and that he would be responsible for litigation fees. they have threatened to supbeona him also. they keep giving him dates that he must pay the amount of $1500 or else the legal actions i stated above would take place. these dates have come and gone and of course nothing has happened. he has also told them not to call him at work. i know they are also violating the FDCPA and the lawyer that helped me with the other CA wants to help me with NES as well. NES seems much more agressive than the other CA so i am worried about what will happen after my lawyer takes them to court since we have no hard proof, no voice recordings. i am wondering if NES will have to give over any recordings they have of conversations with my husband? also i am wondering if anyone else has taken them to court?

I found the following information as informative and appropriate

I found the following information as informative and appropriate for you: -

Source: - ???????http://www.privacyrights.org???????

lrhall41

Submitted by phoenix on Tue, 11/11/2008 - 22:39

( Posts: 1445 | Credits: )

thank you for the info. i know that i can sue them, i have alrea

thank you for the info. i know that i can sue them, i have already sued one CA for violating the fdcpa. the lawyer that helped me with that case wants to also help my husband sue NES. i am just concerned that we do not have any voice recordings of them actually doing it. just my husbands word against theirs. he has not talked to them in the past several weeks because he has moved to a new location in the company he works for. i am sure they are still calling the old location.
should i contact NES and give them my home phone number? i dont necessarily plan on talking to them, i just want to screen the calls and possible get voicemails of them threatening the same things that they did when actually talking to my husband. and if i do ever decide to speak to them i can then record the conversation. would this be a bad idea?

lrhall41

Submitted by on Wed, 11/12/2008 - 09:13

( Posts: | Credits: )

You do not need voice recordings or anything like that. CAs woul

You do not need voice recordings or anything like that. CAs would rather settle in most cases than absorb the cost of trial where they risk more. They consider it the cost of doing business. They know that only one in a thousand will actually sue. I know this from personal experience.

lrhall41

Submitted by Frogpatch on Wed, 11/12/2008 - 09:19

( Posts: 5381 | Credits: )

thanks frogpatch! i was told by UCAN that it would be better i

thanks frogpatch! i was told by UCAN that it would be better if i had voice recordings, but i when i asked my lawyer he said we did not have to have them. i was jsut afraid my lawyer would try to sue them for violating the fdcpa and loose because of not having hard proof.........and then NES would be like attack wolves on my husband and i!!

lrhall41

Submitted by on Wed, 11/12/2008 - 09:46

( Posts: | Credits: )