Skip to main content
index page

FDIC regarding Payday Loans

Submitted by erzeke1 on Fri, 08/25/2006 - 07:30
Posts: 1145
Credits:
[Donate]

Just thought I would post this response I received from the FDIC regarding payday loans.
I also spoke with someone from the Federal Reserve Board about this, and still waiting for information from them!
This may help those who are dealing with banks who are FDIC participating members, that won't help with multiple payday loans close their bank accounts.

Quote:
August 18, 2006

Dear

Thank you for contacting the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).

The FDIC regulates insured state nonmember banks. Therefore, we can only offer comment on issues regarding those institutions.

The FDIC initially issued guidance on payday lending in July 2003 because payday lending is a high-risk activity that represents significant safety and soundness, as well as consumer protection concerns. The FDIC revised the Guidelines for Payday Lending to clarify our expectation that institutions should place appropriate limits on payday loan use. The FDIC issued revised examination guidance on payday lending programs on March 1, 2005.

Recently revised Guidelines for Payday Lending differ from the initial Guidelines issued in July 2003. The revised Guidelines now state that banks should ensure that payday loans are not provided to customers who had payday loans outstanding at any lender for a total of three months during the previous 12 months. When a customer has used payday loans more than three months in the past twelve months, institutions should offer the customer, or refer the customer to, an alternative longer-term credit product that more appropriately suits the customer's needs.

Previously, the Guidelines stated that FDIC-supervised banks should, among other things, (1) establish appropriate "cooling off" or waiting periods between the time a payday loan is repaid and another application is made, and (2) establish the maximum number of loans per customer that are allowed within one calendar year or other designated time period. The FDIC expected banks would establish a combination of cooling off periods and maximum number of loans per customer that would be consistent with the short-term nature of the loan, consistent with the payday lender's advertising and promotional materials discussion of the appropriate short-term use of this product, and consistent with the industry's stated best practice of encouraging consumer responsibility. However, the banks' brief cooling off periods and lack of a meaningful maximum number of loans per customer did not prevent payday loan borrowers from using the product for long-term credit.

The FDIC believes that repeatedly providing short-term credit to borrowers with long-term cash needs is not responsible lending; increases a bank's exposure to credit, legal, reputation, and compliance risks; and can create a serious financial hardship for the customer. By actively prohibiting frequent borrower use of this short-term credit product, a bank can reduce its exposure to these risks.

We trust this is responsive to your inquiry. As part of our ongoing efforts to improve our service to the public, we would appreciate it if you would complete a short questionnaire on the level of service you received from this office. The questionnaire form can be accessed at http://www2.fdic.gov/starsmail/customer.html.



Sincerely,
Doris Jo nes
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Division of Supervision and Consumer Protection
Consumer Response Center
2345 Grand Boulevard, Suite 100
Kansas City, MO 64108
1-800-378-9581
Fax number 703-812-1020


Erezekiel, This is good information. You always do great posts with alot of helpful info. KYSIDE38


Submitted by KYSIDE38 on Fri, 09/01/2006 - 16:23

KYSIDE38

( Posts: 2477 | Credits: )


This bill is in committee. If everyone will write their congressman to get this on the floor for a vote, it would go a long way to protect consumers and put these "loan sharks" in their place.. Then they could not argue about following state laws. It would be in plain English for them to read.
Lets band together and show support for this Bill


Submitted by on Fri, 12/01/2006 - 12:17

( Posts: 202330 | Credits: )


I got this a while back and just thought I would post it here to let you guys see.... November 14, 2006

Quote:

Dear :

Thank you for your correspondence regarding debt collection practices. The Federal Trade Commission enforces the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ("fdcpa" or "Act"), which prohibits unfair, deceptive and abusive debt collection practices by collection agencies and other third-party debt collectors. It also gives you certain rights when you are being treated improperly by a debt collector. Although the FTC staff is not in a position to intervene on your behalf in resolving your problem, we would like to outline some of the provisions of the Act for you and explain how you can use it to avoid further distress. We note at the outset, however, that the Act generally does not cover either the collection of commercial debts or the collection activities of the party to whom you allegedly owe your debt (the creditor) so long as the creditor is collecting in its own name. The Act applies only to third-party debt collectors collecting consumer debts.

Congress enacted the FDCPA in 1977 in response to mounting evidence of the use of improper debt collection techniques in the marketplace. The Act prohibits several of these techniques, including, for example, disclosing consumers' debts to most third parties without the consumers' consent. It also forbids false threats to coerce payment (such as threats of suit or other actions when they probably will never occur) and any sort of oral harassment (such as threats of violence, profanity, and continuous calls) over the telephone. No calls may be made very early in the morning or late at night, calls to a consumer at work are restricted, and debt collectors may not add charges to the debt unless the consumer has agreed to them or they are permitted by state law. Finally, a debt collector may not sue a consumer outside the district (1) of the consumer's residence or (2) where the contract creating the debt was signed.

If you believe that you do not owe the debt, you may file a dispute with the debt collector. If you do so in writing within thirty days of the date the collector notifies you of this right, the Act requires the collector to stop all collection efforts until it provides you with written verification of the debt. The Act also specifies that the debt collector inform you of this requirement at the beginning of the collection process. If you were not so informed, the collector violated the law.

Instead of filing a dispute, you may choose to send them a letter demanding that the debt collector cease all further collection efforts. If you do so in writing, the Act requires that the collector comply with the demand. We suggest that you send the letter by certified mail, return receipt requested, and keep a copy for your records. Please note, however, that sending a cease communication letter does not prevent the debt collector or the creditor from filing suit against you. It does, however, prevent them from calling you and sending collection notices.

If you believe that the debt collector that is contacting you violated the law in this or any other way, you may additionally:

1) File a complaint with your state or local consumer protection office and/or the party to whom you originally owed the debt (the debt collector's client). If you file a complaint, describe the circumstances in detail and send copies of all written materials received from the collector. Any of these parties might take independent action against the collector.

2) File a private suit against the debt collector in any court for violations of the Act and, if you are successful, receive actual damages, attorney's fees, and additional damages up to $1,000.

Remember, however, that the Act does not function to erase a valid debt, even if a debt collector has violated the law in attempting to collect it from you. If you really owe the debt, you will still have to cope with the consequences of non-payment if you do not pay. Remember also that some collection techniques, while unpleasant or distasteful, are not law violations. For example, a debt collector may:

1) Contact third parties solely to determine where you are, so long as the collector does not disclose the existence of your debt.

2) Contact you at work if the debt collector has no reason to believe that your employer prohibits the contact (and you have not filed a cease-communication request).

3) Use a rude or angry tone on the telephone, if the overall communication with you cannot truly be characterized as abusive or harassing.

4) Threaten consequences of non-payment that are truthful. For example, debt collectors may threaten to sue if suit will, in fact, be the result of non-payment. They also may threaten to report your debt to a credit bureau if, in fact, they intend and are legally able to do so. It is to your advantage to know the probable result of withholding payment, if it is accurate.

5) Accept or solicit a post-dated check, if the collector does not deposit it before the date on the check.

6) Refuse to accept a partial payment for a debt (even if you had such an arrangement with the creditor). If there is more than one debt, the collector must credit the account that you designate.

If you owe the debt, we suggest that, before you resort to some of the stronger measures outlined above, you try to work out any payment difficulties, first with the debt collector and next with your creditor. Finally, if you decide to proceed further, or if you think that the collector or creditor is about to take legal action against you, be sure to contact your local legal aid office or an attorney for advice.

Like the FDCPA provisions discussed above, you may also find certain Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) provisions helpful if you believe that a debt collector is providing inaccurate information about you to a credit bureau. To fully protect your rights under the FCRA, we strongly recommend that you dispute the credit report item in writing to both the credit bureau and the debt collector. When you dispute the item to the credit bureau, the FCRA requires that the credit bureau pass your dispute to the debt collector, along with all relevant information you provided. The debt collector must investigate the dispute (which includes a review of the information you provided) and report what it found to the credit bureau within thirty days after you first disputed the item to the credit bureau.

During this same period, the credit bureau must also review the information you provided. If the debt collector reports that the credit report item is incorrect and should be deleted, or fails to report to the credit bureau at all within the thirty-day period, the credit bureau must delete the item from its files. If the debt collector reports that the item is inaccurate and should be changed to a less delinquent status (e.g., 30 days late, rather than 120 days late), but not deleted, the credit bureau must make that change in its files.

We hope that this information has been helpful to you. Please be assured that we are always interested in reports of law violations. If we cannot act immediately to remedy them, we will retain whatever you have provided for possible use in future enforcement actions. The efficacy of our FDCPA enforcement program is largely dependent upon information we receive from individuals like you. Thank you for writing.



Sincerely yours,


Consumer Response Center


Submitted by on Fri, 12/01/2006 - 15:33

( Posts: 202330 | Credits: )