logo

Debtconsolidationcare.com - the USA consumer forum

What to do next?

Date: Thu, 06/28/2007 - 09:38

Submitted by pinkdoodles1979
on Thu, 06/28/2007 - 09:38

Posts: 21 Credits: [Donate]

Total Replies: 37


I live in Florida and have 4 pdls

MTE Financial (tendollarpaydayloan) borrowed 300 pd. 360.00
Cashnetusa borrowed 300 pd. 345.00
SJM Marketing borrowed 250 pd 675 (never applied for this one)
Unitedcashloans borrowed 250 pd 425

I recently closed my account and opened a new one and explained the situation to my bank and they are being very helpful in stopping anything that keeps trying to post.
I also sent letters to all four places revoking their ACH debits, I sent one on Tuesday, and then the second one I sent on Wednesday and that one included the Florida laws regarding pdls, but I still have not heard anything back from these companies. I was hoping someone out there could let me know what my next step is. I think that based on what I understood of the Fl. law all my accounts are paid in full and some way overpaid!! Please any suggestions?
Thanks


Cash net USA might give you a paid in full. The others are probably going to ignore you letter and start calling you with threats. Just remeber that they can't "have you arrested" or garnish your wages. Make sure you send a letter revoking any wage assignment agreement you may have made. This is voluntary and can be revoked. They cannot garnish in Florida if you claim head of household status. If you search this site by typing their names above you will get lots of info on how you can expect them to behave.


lrhall41

Submitted by Frogpatch on Thu, 06/28/2007 - 09:59

( Posts: 5381 | Credits: )


You should file with the Florida Division of Financial Services @ www.fldfs.com They are the regulators for the Payday loan industry. If you are in the Orlando/ Tampa vicinity the managers name is Sam Whited for the Payday loan industry. The CEO is Alex Sink and I have heard that she is very interested in the companies that are not licensed. There was a case won in the Florida Supreme Court a few years back by a woman named Wendy Betts who was tired of all the interest so she sued a bunch of them and won. You can google her name.


lrhall41

Submitted by Frogpatch on Thu, 06/28/2007 - 13:11

( Posts: 5381 | Credits: )


pink doodles,
this is what I sent ARM last night:

Quote:

June 27, 2007

Accounts Recievable Management
9000 Regency Square Blvd
Ground Floor
Suite 1
Jacksonville, FL 32211



To Whom It May Concern:

This letter is being sent to you in response to noticing an entry by your company on my credit reports. Be advised that this is not a refusal to pay, but a notice sent pursuant to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 USC 1692g Sec. 809 (b) that your claim is disputed and validation is requested.

This is NOT a request for verification or proof of my mailing address, but a request for VALIDATION made pursuant to the above named Title and Section. I respectfully request that your offices provide me with competent evidence that I have any legal obligation to pay you.

What do I need you to provide as the debt validation.
?????? What the money you say I owe is for;
?????? Explain and show me how you calculated what you say I owe;
?????? Provide me with copies of any papers that show I agreed to pay what you say I owe;
?????? Provide a verification or copy of any judgment if applicable;
?????? Identify the original creditor;
?????? Prove the Statute of Limitations has not expired on this account
?????? Show me that you are licensed to collect in my state
?????? Provide me with your license numbers and Registered Agent
?????? Proof that the collection company owns the debt/or has been assigned the debt. (Proof showing you are legally entitled to collect this particular debt from me.) This is basic contract law.
?????? Complete payment history, starting with the original creditor. (I need to have proof of my payment history with original Creditor, what the amount of the debt was when the creditor assigned the debt to your company, and what fees/interest has been tacked on to this debt and how you/they determined these fees.) This requirement was established by the case Fields v. Wilber Law Firm, Donald L. Wilber and Kenneth Wilber, USCA-02-C-0072, 7th Circuit Court, Sept 2004..
?????? Copy of the original signed loan agreement or credit card application. (My contract with the original creditor establishing the debt between us.) This is also basic contract law.

At this time I will also inform you that if your offices have reported invalidated information to any of the 3 major Credit Bureau's (Equifax, Experian or TransUnion) this action might constitute fraud under both Federal and State Laws. Due to this fact, if any negative mark is found on any of my credit reports by your company or the company that you represent

I will not hesitate in bringing legal action against you for the following:
?????? Violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act
?????? Violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
?????? Defamation of Character

If your offices are able to provide the proper documentation as requested in the following Declaration, I will require at least 30 days investigating this information and during such time all collection activity must cease and desist.

Also during this validation period, if any action is taken which could be considered detrimental to any of my credit reports, I will consult with my legal counsel for suit. This includes any listing or any information to a credit reporting repository that could be inaccurate or invalidated or verifying an account as accurate when in fact there is no provided proof that it is.

If your offices fail to respond to this validation request within 30 days from the date of your receipt, all references to this account must be deleted and completely removed from my credit file and a copy of such deletion request shall be sent to me immediately.

I would also like to request, in writing, that no telephone contact be made by your offices to my home or to my place of employment. If your offices attempt telephone communication with me, including but not limited to computer generated calls and calls or correspondence sent to or with any third parties, it will be considered harassment and I will have no choice but to file suit. All future communications with me MUST be done in writing and sent to the address noted in this letter by USPS.

I have overpaid both of the loans I have had with this company, including Quickest-Cash-Advance and 500 Fast Cash, and have filed complaints against you with the Wisconsin State Attorney General, the Wisconsin Department of Financial Institutions, the Better Business Bureau, and the State Attorney General of Oklahoma. I have overpaid $635 on a $300 as well as paying $500 on a $300 loan. According to the State Attorney General of Oklahoma, you have been ordered to stop lending to citizens of the state of Oklahoma, as well as any other state. Therefore, as you are not a legal, licensed lender in the state of which you reside, as well as any other state, you are not licensed to lend.

As I have paid you LEGALLY what I have owed you, including overpaying my loans with your company, I am asking you to mark my accounts paid in full, and consider the matter null and void.

CEASE and DESIST your efforts to contact me. You are not a licensed lender in the State of Wisconsin, but according to the State of Wisconsin DFI, you have to follow the State of Wisconsin collection practices. And, according to the State of Wisconsin, it is ILLEGAL for you to continue to contact me at work, if I have requested you not to, and it is ILLEGAL to contact me in a harassing or threatening manner . If you continue to contact me at work or any of my references, I will be forced to file another round of complaints, including the local police department for harassment charges, as well as filing charges with the FTC.
It would be advisable that you assure that your records are in order before I am forced to take legal action. This is an attempt to correct your records; any information obtained shall be used for that purpose.

Best Regards,


lrhall41

Submitted by debtfreein08 on Thu, 06/28/2007 - 13:56

( Posts: 214 | Credits: )


So, they won't contact me again? When I asked my state DFI officer who is helping me with this, this was the conversation:

Thanks for getting back to me. I did send the collection agency a debt validation letter so that they could show me what I legally owe them, if anything, and how they legally calculated the debt and interest, as the collection agency said that I had 30 days to validate the debt. If this collection agency doesn't respond to the letter within 30 days, as I have been informed showing me what I legally owe them, am I still obligated to pay it? If they don't get back to me at all, is the matter then null and void? I'm just trying to understand my rights and make sure I don't get sued.


He said this:

The 30 days to dispute a debt only applies to the customer who is disputing the debt. There is no time limit for the collection agency to respond. With any collection dispute, if the collection agency can prove that the debt is valid, you can be held liable for the balance. If a collection agency does not respond to your dispute, they can not collect the debt. The debt is generally returned to the original creditor at that time.

So, why don't they respond back, because this debt is not valid? I am so confused, and scared. I don't want to have this hang over my head forever!


lrhall41

Submitted by debtfreein08 on Thu, 07/05/2007 - 06:48

( Posts: 214 | Credits: )


ARM might make a feeble attempt to validate. They are trying to collect a debt that, according to your last post, met the terms of the loan. If you met the terms of the loan they can't validate the debt because you have it in writing. I would not worry about this one, you can't lose. I would forget about it and move on. If they send you anything just send them what you have in writing.


lrhall41

Submitted by Frogpatch on Thu, 07/05/2007 - 08:11

( Posts: 5381 | Credits: )


Well, this is what MTE said to the BBB about my loan, and the argument:
We believe all the terms and conditions of this loan have been met on our end, unfortunately debtfreein08 defaulted on her loan agreement and refused to repay her debt. Her account has been referred to an outside collection agency for handling. We no longer have any control over the account.

So, they are saying that I met all of the terms, correct?


lrhall41

Submitted by debtfreein08 on Thu, 07/05/2007 - 08:14

( Posts: 214 | Credits: )


So I finally got a call from someone at Cash Net USA, the lady was very nice. I told her my situation and asked her if they had recieved the many letters that I had sent them, she double checked and said yes that there was a notation regarding my account and the letters. I also told her that after doing some research that I had discovered that I had overpaid according to my state's lending laws. She said that she would review the account and have a manager look into it. She was very pleasant to deal with. Keeping my fingers crossed!! Also I have noticed that on their website they state that they are a member of the CSFA, so I went onto cfsa.net to see who they were and I found out that if in fact Cash Net USA is indeed a member they have been doing business illegally in the state of Florida (or at least in my case). The CFSA has regulations for their members. One being that in order to lend to someone they must be licensed in the state where that person lives as well as follow the lending laws in that state. Now I've heard that Cash Net USA is licensed everywhere however in my case Florida does not allow rollovers and there has to be a 24 hour cooling off period before another loan can be issued along with the interest only being 10% for every 100.00 dollars and Cash Net USA has been doing rollovers (4 to be exact) and according to my calculations on a 300.00 loan I've paid them 345.00, which would be just a little more than the allowable for my state, however they were trying to get their last payment (the one after the 4 rollovers) of 200.00. That is definitely not going to happen, I do not owe them anymore and I will make sure that if they come back with a settlement offer to mention what I found on the CFSA website especially if they are indeed members. Just thought I would share, possibly some good news!!


lrhall41

Submitted by pinkdoodles1979 on Thu, 07/05/2007 - 13:40

( Posts: 21 | Credits: )


According to what I have read from another member Cashnetusa Rents the license of Pawn shops and Storefronts and that is how they are licensed. If this is legal in Florida and if they are even renting a license here I am not sure. They are easy to deal with and much more professional that htere conpetition and also seem to have a very high hit rate on the internet. I see more people everyday that have loans with them. When I was getting into this mess a lender told me he could not lend in Florida because he was not licensed there. He suggested I call CasNetUsa. What does that tell you? A. They need to be licensed and B. Cashnet is licensed somehow.


lrhall41

Submitted by Frogpatch on Thu, 07/05/2007 - 13:55

( Posts: 5381 | Credits: )


According to my paperwork the company listed is Cash America Net of Florida however their address is in Ohio and Chicago and so far I have been unable to find them being licensed in Florida as well, so I really don't know what to do now. I'll have to keep looking in the contract and see if there are other names listed maybe.


lrhall41

Submitted by pinkdoodles1979 on Fri, 07/06/2007 - 08:33

( Posts: 21 | Credits: )