Debtconsolidationcare.com - the USA consumer forum

I NEED TO ANSWER A COURT SUMMONS!!! Can Someone Help Me?

Date: Mon, 07/09/2007 - 12:29

Submitted by poconomoki
on Mon, 07/09/2007 - 12:29

Posts: 111 Credits: [Donate]

Total Replies: 99


I received a court summons. The whole scenario is that it's from the Special Civil Part of Superior Court NJ and I reside in Pennsylvania!


The Plantiff is David J Apothaker - AGD Financial Trust 2002a. The original creditor is PROVIDIAN. There is a state of Account stapled to the back and typewritten and states the debtor's name, account number, creditor, original creditor, DATE OF DEBT August 13, 2001 Balance Due $4,556.42.

I called Apothaker and the gal there stated it's mine and that I cannot validate it I had my chance since they sent numerous letters. I asked where and she told me to the address on the summons. Well if I wanted this to stop I could send her 30% of the total due and then pay $200 a month. I told her we're retired people living on pension. She then asked do you expect to go back to work? Can someone make a loan?

Well I then called an attorney in PA and he said that I can't be sued in PA from NJ.

Another attorney stated oh wait until they serve you in PA.

A friend said the same thing....they have to sue in PA.

I called a NJ attorney and he said there's nothing he can do I live in PA and they can't sue me in NJ if I live in PA.

This whole thing is driving me crazy and I just want to answer them and see if this is really mine.

I called the courthouse and they want an answer. Can someone guide me on the verbage of this letter. I have until July 30th to get this to the courthouse in NJ.

I would appreciate all the help I can get.

Sincere regards


I've been emailing all the attorneys on the naca list in NJ and now I was told that I need a PA attorney and the PA attorney told me I need a NJ attorney. I'm so confused and I'm in tears.

I know it's Friday the 13th but is this a joke or what? Where are you supposed to turn on this?

I am totally disgusted at this point.


lrhall41

Submitted by poconomoki on Fri, 07/13/2007 - 07:05

( Posts: 111 | Credits: )


2500 is way too much. I just got a retainer on a case for $400 which was fully refundable if the lawyer did not take the case. He took the case and the final cost was $1000. This case had nothing to do with finances but I am pretty sure it took more work than what your case will require. Your case should be done after you answer the summons if all goes well.

I do not know what is up with your husbands. Ang tell your husband if he wants to give me 12,500 I will take care of that debt for you guys. Heheh. My wife is similar to your husbands though. Although instead of paying she just ignores creditors and I end up having to deal with them. I married into a big mess.


lrhall41

Submitted by DOLLARSandSINCE on Fri, 07/13/2007 - 07:23

( Posts: 1078 | Credits: )


LOL Dollars! I'll give hubby ur addy ok?? ;) That's what i tried to explain to him!! Why in the HELL would u pay $12,500 on a $4,400 original debt???
Sheesshhhhh...
Now Moki, i'm so sorry!! It IS Friday the 13th but all's not bad.... it just looks like ur gonna have to hang tight for bud hibbs answer and if that fails then ur gonna have to do it on ur own!! Heck it may all work out and u succeded!! :D
Be strong, we're all here backing u up!
Ang


lrhall41

Submitted by Ang on Fri, 07/13/2007 - 08:21

( Posts: 2306 | Credits: )


I haven't gotten an answer from anyone. I guess why I'm so afraid of going it alone is because a comma might be out of place and they'll grant them a judgement because a comma ia out of whack.

I will have this in the mail Monday afternoon, priority mail, certified return receipt!

I figure I can bounce this back and forth with some the forum members. I will post the letter and let you guys critque it.


lrhall41

Submitted by poconomoki on Fri, 07/13/2007 - 08:32

( Posts: 111 | Credits: )


I finally had a chance to sit down with that god awful summons. I look at this thing and it mentions Count one, number one PLANTIFF SUE FOR THE PRICE OF GOOD SOLD AND OR SERVICES RENDERED ON BOOK ACCOUNT.
What book account?

Count one number 2 There is still due on said account the sum of $4,526.66 toghether with interest from August 13, 2001 of which no part has been paid although repeated demands for same have been made and as often refused.

I need to know what book account? Basically, how do I anwer those two counts and sound intelligent?


lrhall41

Submitted by poconomoki on Sat, 07/14/2007 - 03:51

( Posts: 111 | Credits: )


I googled them and found this summons sheet on someone else. Notice that the defendant is from Mo and they are suing him in Mo.

http://www.greenecountymo.org/ccourt31/calendar/..%5Cnxhist.exe?casen=307AC4630

Do they still think you reside in NJ? What is the address the summons was issued to, Pa or NJ. Where does your mother in law live? Pa or NJ.


lrhall41

Submitted by fedupinpa on Sat, 07/14/2007 - 04:23

( Posts: 1511 | Credits: )


I guess what I am trying to figure out here is are they representing providian or did providian sell the debt to them? I had two cases, the first one was capital one and the attorney was BLM, in all paperwork it stated that capital one was the plaintiff and that BLM was representing them. These are the ones that keep continuing the case. I have paid them over half. Last payment is on 7/27, I think they will drop it then.

The other with providian is a completey different story. Cach bought the debt for pennies on the dollar and now they are trying to collect it and more. They want $2800 from me. I refused to pay it until they prove they legally own it. I would answer the questions to the court to get you out of the time frame they issue.

I will pm you on what I did.


lrhall41

Submitted by fedupinpa on Sat, 07/14/2007 - 04:35

( Posts: 1511 | Credits: )


I have to check the credit report. The link you posted, those are the clowns. Now I know that there's a suit against Apothaker in Northampton County. I'm trying to get the link. I googled Apothaker David J and it popped up. Seems like AGD and Apothaker are having a field day.

The suit in Northampton County, PA is where the gal is suing them. I have the docket number and I would love to know who is representing her. I would sing like a canary.

What I can't understand is how can they sue in NJ against a person who lives in PA and then enforce NJ law in PA? I'm just so confused. Time our for a panic attack.


lrhall41

Submitted by poconomoki on Sat, 07/14/2007 - 05:07

( Posts: 111 | Credits: )


Just stay calm, get mean, see who is listed on your credit report.

Do you think they are representing providian directly or do you think this is a collection agency that purchased the debt. If they are representing the original creditor it changes the rules completely. You need to find this out.


lrhall41

Submitted by fedupinpa on Sat, 07/14/2007 - 05:11

( Posts: 1511 | Credits: )


Go look on ur credit report Moki! U can get a free one at the address fed gave u up there ^^^. It only takes a few minutes and then u will see who legally owns this debt or claims to anyway!
Good Luck,
Ang
P.S. sorry i keep getting ur case mixed up with CACH! Cuz this sounds EXACTLY like something CACH would do!


lrhall41

Submitted by Ang on Sat, 07/14/2007 - 05:19

( Posts: 2306 | Credits: )


PLANTIFF LISTED IS

AGD FINANCIAL TRUST 2002A


The reference to PROVIDIAN is on the attached STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT which is typewritten and listed as ORIGINAL CREDITOR.

Fed got your pm. I am answering this no matter what. Will answering this change time frames? How? Also, do you think a tax statement and driver license is enough to prove residency in the Commonwealth of PA? Another question, is it legal to sue someone in one state and they don't live there?

One attorney in PA told me that he can do a lot once it comes to PA. Does that sound right?


lrhall41

Submitted by poconomoki on Sat, 07/14/2007 - 05:31

( Posts: 111 | Credits: )


I'm no atty here but that sounds right to me! Seems they would have to sue u where u live.... but these sneaky CA's, mostly, will try anything. ANd they were probably banking on u NOT answering and winning by default! SURPRISE SURPRISE (in my best gomer pyle voice) to them! ;)
Much luck Moki,
Ang


lrhall41

Submitted by Ang on Sat, 07/14/2007 - 05:44

( Posts: 2306 | Credits: )


Ang,

Default was they're game. They know I moved. I mean come on.....2-1/2 years and my address doesn't show up anywhere. Yeah, sure right, tell me another story and are you on planet earth?

I suspect that they were hoping that I wouldn't get the summons and then it would be a default.

Let me get something straight.....when I answer they cannot get a default judgement or perhaps even a judgement at all?

I did look up venue and all that stuff with the Fed's and it states must be served in your venue. I didn't know PA merged with NJ. If they did, I wasn't notified. I really think this is going to be a humdinger of a case.

Back to answering a bunch of bozos.

Will keep you posted.


lrhall41

Submitted by poconomoki on Sat, 07/14/2007 - 05:52

( Posts: 111 | Credits: )


If u answer they can NOT get a default!! Once u answer this summons the burden of proof is on them as they are the ones suing u! THEY have to prove all this bs they said on the summons! SO deny all that u can of it! Don't lie though, this is a court! Just answer honestly but deny all that u can!
I did give u an example of how to answer right? Sorry this forum is just SO big i forget who got what! lol
Much luck Moki, stay strong!
Ang


lrhall41

Submitted by Ang on Sat, 07/14/2007 - 06:02

( Posts: 2306 | Credits: )


hi moki--

I will again extend this offer to you. I am not a lawyer but I do know this law well, and I have experience dealing with different courts, so I can understand a lot of the legal speak. I dont want any money, I just want to help. You can send me a private message through this forum if you are interested. You have a rock solid case, no matter which place they filed suit. The SOL, by the way, is the same in NJ as it is in PA, so you still have that reason for dismissal. If you want, I can go over everything with you, from the wording to use in your answer to specific laws that you can cite to support your claims. If you are interested, please let me know. Again, please understand, I will not accept any kind of payment for this, I dont want it. I just want to help a fellow member out. These CA's really get me all kinds of pissed, and I have basically declared war on them....so, let me know if there is anything I can do. I would be glad to help you get through this--we all will!


lrhall41

Submitted by skydivr7673 on Sat, 07/14/2007 - 06:40

( Posts: 2036 | Credits: )


moki and ang--

the law allows a CA to legally file suit against you in one of two places.....

1--the jurisdiction where you currently reside
2--the jurisdiction where the credit agreement was originally signed, regardless of whether you actually live there or not.

This is up to the CA, they have that choice. This is not illegal, so there is no possibility of using "improper venue" for your defense.

Moki, when you answer, they cannot get a default judgment, that is correct. And if you answer this properly, they cannot get any judgment at all. The info you have posted clearly shows something, let me show you....this is what you posted earlier--



The red text is your ace in the hole, moki. This clearly shows that they are trying to charge you interest from a date nearly six years ago, and you have not paid anything in this time. What does that mean? Simple--the statute of limitations is clearly expired! SOL in NJ, same as in PA, is four years on this debt. This is the only answer you need right here. OF course, I would still bring up the improper service as well.

Also, they will not get a default against you if a comma is out of place. I know you are worried about that, but it cannot happen. Go ahead and post up your letter, we will take a look and make sure it all fits. Above all, take a deep breath, this is going to go your way. You are going to be ok!


lrhall41

Submitted by skydivr7673 on Sat, 07/14/2007 - 06:56

( Posts: 2036 | Credits: )


Sky

I'm working on it. Why I'm so confused about venue is how can one answer when they didn't get the paperwork. It was just a miracle that my husband went down there.

They're statement that I refused is totally wrong. How the heck can I refuse when I was never asked.

The only thing that is bothering me is the sol. I swear I saw somewhere that it was 6 years.

I'm just worried about the bank account and the house. This is just a credit card nothing more nothing less. The bank account has my husband's pension check. This is our only means of support and if they get that we are sunk. I don't want to get booted out of my house either.

Oh God the thoughts that are going through my head right now.

Ok I will get this to you by tomorrow. Lots of typing.

It's in Monday's mail!


lrhall41

Submitted by poconomoki on Sat, 07/14/2007 - 07:53

( Posts: 111 | Credits: )


UPDATE!!!!

Husband came across more mail from Mom's

In it was a letter from a CA

Nelson Watson & Associates, LLC
80 Merrimack St
Haverhill, MA

In the letter is listed the same account number for the one on the summons.

Creditor is Arrow Financial

Original Creditor is AGD Financial Trust 2002a
Account number SAME AS ON SUMMONS

Instructions to send payment to Nelson, Watson and Associates.

What the heck am I dealing with. Should I include this in the court package?


lrhall41

Submitted by poconomoki on Sun, 07/15/2007 - 04:37

( Posts: 111 | Credits: )


UPDATE!!!!

Husband came across more mail from Mom's

In it was a letter from a CA

Nelson Watson & Associates, LLC
80 Merrimack St
Haverhill, MA

In the letter is listed the same account number for the one on the summons.

Creditor is Arrow Financial

Original Creditor is AGD Financial Trust 2002a
Account number SAME AS ON SUMMONS

Instructions to send payment to Nelson, Watson and Associates.

What the heck am I dealing with. Should I include this in the court package?


lrhall41

Submitted by poconomoki on Sun, 07/15/2007 - 04:38

( Posts: 111 | Credits: )


As fed has asked have u checked ur credit report yet? It's really easy to do at annualcreditreport.com, that's right isn't it? They give u one free a year. Go look and see who has this debt now! Ur original creditor should be shown as a charge off, then it should show who owns this debt now and quite frankly both of the CA's are probably reporting still. You NEED to check this out and have them correct it!
Good Luck Moki,
Ang
P.S. Hate to even say this but do ya think ur hubby's been keeping this from u?? The papers from CA?? YIKES! Hope not, also dont' panic they will NOT take ur home! A judge at the worst will set up a payment plan for u and if not i think all that will happen is a lein on ur home... I've never heard of them taking someone's home from under them!!


lrhall41

Submitted by Ang on Sun, 07/15/2007 - 05:56

( Posts: 2306 | Credits: )


This whole thing is so confusing. I'm beginning to think that this is just an attorney who probably bought this account.

I'm still spinning on the answers. I do know that I'm denying all the counts and I am putting my proof of residency from PA in that package going to the court. I'll be damned that they say I received anything in NJ except for the certifed letter since my mother in law signed for it. I'm still battling this move from NJ to PA. Seems like we are being punished for the time we spent 6 months in a rental home. It was in a private community we didn't have a mailbbox since we were not permanent residents. My husband's solution was to send everything to HIS mother! Well after the electric bills disappeared mysteriously and then reappeared after the account went to collection I started to see the light. My mother in law did make a statement before we left NJ....."I don't want you to go to PA". Hmm I just wonder if this isn't a way to get back at ME! She's 85 and I don't think she lost the marbles yet.

I'm just so pissed that I didn't get the CA letter so I could set up a payment plan or whatever. Now I have the husband screaming and yelling they better not touch my pension check. He took my name off of the bank account so I'm sitting here with no access to money except when I beg him.

Totally disgusted and ready to choke.


lrhall41

Submitted by poconomoki on Sun, 07/15/2007 - 06:02

( Posts: 111 | Credits: )


Well Moki, actually it's better to have everything separate! Me n hubby have always had our own accts along with ONE joint acct. And now that this suit has come along it's actually a good thing! We DO live in a community property state so that's why CACH is now trying to go after him... SIGHS. But as far as our home, he owned it prior to the marriage 22 years ago so it's NOT considered community property and our savings acct (only in his name) is from an inheritance from his dad, again not community property but guess i'm lucky cuz i NEVER have to beg for $$. He's very generous when it comes to me and the kids but i also work and get paid cash money so that's our mad money! ;)
Plz be strong and hang on for the ride! It'll all work out, always does in life....
U have lots of folks on ur side here on this forum and we'll help u and support u thru this whole mess!
Take a few deep breathes and enjoy ya Sunday!
:D
Ang


lrhall41

Submitted by Ang on Sun, 07/15/2007 - 06:16

( Posts: 2306 | Credits: )


Thanks Ang for the shoulder to lean on. I just have to get this in the mail. I did send all the infor to Sky. I just don't want to screw up on an answer. I know how these things can get off on a technicality.

I know that these people are doing something wrong here just from looking at the credit report, ca letter and now the summons.

Who the hell ever heard of AGD Financial c/o David J Apothaker what is this long distance?

I just don't want them to get that judgment. I remember speaking with the girl at the law firm and she told me I have to prove it's not me.

I'm just praying that I send in deny on all the questions along with a proof of residency here in PA and the judge tells them go sue in PA. If I can get it here I have plenty of attorneys that will take the case.

Panic attack number 3 and it's only 9:30am here.


lrhall41

Submitted by poconomoki on Sun, 07/15/2007 - 06:27

( Posts: 111 | Credits: )


Breathe Moki breathe! U've got lots of support here and seems the ball will soon be rolling in ur court! Hang tight, as my atty tells me ALL the time! SIGHS. I know it's hard but it'll be ok, and as long as u answer they can NOT get a default... the rest is up to the judge which btw u may have to go and appear if it gets that far, somehow i doubt it though!
Keep taking deep breaths and ull be ok soon,
Ang


lrhall41

Submitted by Ang on Sun, 07/15/2007 - 06:31

( Posts: 2306 | Credits: )


And btw...
when i went in for my judgment rule, the judge was SUPER nice! They're people just like we are! I was SO freaking out to go into a court room but he made me feel comfortable and was very nice man! All he did was send us out in the hallway for this atty to ask me a million questions which i had brought all documentation for! He was shocked that i had it all there, guess most people dont'.... I was ready for them this time! :)
SO just remember the judge is just a man in a robe! ;)
Ang


lrhall41

Submitted by Ang on Sun, 07/15/2007 - 06:34

( Posts: 2306 | Credits: )


Hi moki--

check your PM's, I sent you a response. Also, this is very important, what kind of debt is this? Was it a credit card account? You mentioned the 6 year SOL, there are actually different SOL's for different kinds of debts. In NJ, a credit card account(or any other open-ended credit account) has a SOL of 4 years. If this was a set loan, for a set amount of money, that would be a contract debt, which has a SOL of 6 years. That is why you saw two differnt numbers for SOL in NJ. We need to make sure of the kind of debt this is.


lrhall41

Submitted by skydivr7673 on Sun, 07/15/2007 - 07:42

( Posts: 2036 | Credits: )


I can tell you from personal experience that they would have no problem getting your address. You have official things on record at that address, I could actually pull up a database right now because of my expeirence in bail enforcement/fugitive recovery. They likely didnt even try.

Also one more thing, do you know what date the complaint was actually filed by them in the court??


lrhall41

Submitted by skydivr7673 on Sun, 07/15/2007 - 08:59

( Posts: 2036 | Credits: )


Well I'm working on the summons right now! I just want to get the answer in the mail so I know it's out.

Panic attacks are still coming and the worse is just waking up from a sound sleep.

I have nightmares of them kicking me out of my home, seizing my husband's bank account and all that stuff.

Hopefully, the answers will make them see the light.


lrhall41

Submitted by poconomoki on Mon, 07/16/2007 - 04:32

( Posts: 111 | Credits: )


It's 10:43 AM and I just finished the answers to the summons with the help of Skydiver and ANG, FED and all the forum members. I cannot express the gratitude to him and all the forum members who are supporting me! I will be on my way to the post office shortly to mail this CERTIFIED, RETURN RECEIPT!

Now all I have to do is wait and pray it is acceptable to the court.

Skydiver you are in my prayers and I am forever grateful.

After the post office I'm going to take a well deserved nap.


Now we'll wait for round 2.


lrhall41

Submitted by poconomoki on Mon, 07/16/2007 - 07:47

( Posts: 111 | Credits: )


I am in a huge dispute with David/Edward Apothaker. The first thing they said when I called once I received the summons (via sheriff which I was really proud of), was that Edward was "not an attorney." My debt includes 2 seperate lines of credit that I took out three years ago when I had a much different lifestyle. I admit to the debt, but both have been almost DOUBLED in cost due to "interest." I fought back and forth with this guy for hours. I don't have the money they want. I asked if he would fax me proof and he just kept saying "I can't send you anything, you can write it down if you want." The second line of credit that they have on file was not even involved with the summons, and he would not deal with me if I would not deal with both. I don't know, part of me thinks it would be better for me to just go to court. Any words of wisdom?


lrhall41

Submitted by on Wed, 08/12/2009 - 13:45

( Posts: | Credits: )


Yes, it would be better to go to court. Often the attorney in the case is more reasonable at that point and they would be far more willing to come to a settlement arrangement IF they can prove it's all your debt and they have the legal right (which I honestly doubt) to charge you all those fees. You would file a Motion for Discovery, which is *far* more comprehensive than the DV procedures - by a mile.

Here is some info on negotiating for a settlement arrangement in court in order to avoid a judgement:
"http://www.nedap.org/hotline/settle.html" It is for New York and so may vary in slight details with your state.


lrhall41

Submitted by Chrys Henderson on Thu, 08/13/2009 - 05:02

( Posts: 2538 | Credits: )