logo

Debtconsolidationcare.com - the USA consumer forum

Leaving UK owing money to bank

Date: Sun, 05/10/2009 - 12:27

Submitted by anonymous
on Sun, 05/10/2009 - 12:27

Posts: 202330 Credits: [Donate]

Total Replies: 6


Hi, I've owed £1,500 to my bank for an overdraft for some time as I haven't worked for awhile. My visa is soon expiring and I have to leave and am unable to pay it before I go. I do intend on paying it back over time as I hate the thought of loose ends but just can't do before I have to leave. Will I have any trouble just leaving the country owing this money? I don't want to tell the bank in case they ask for it to be paid back immediately, which they probably will as it has been owed for some time and I can't do right now.


Quote:

The above threat shows that you CAN be pursued outside your own country. International collections is becoming more and more common.


They may be more common but are still just as ineffective except for nuisance value.

Let's assume the OP has to leave UK and return to USA. The costs of suing him in a US Court by a foreign-domiciled plaintiff would be astronomical. The Plaintiff would have to send someone to the Court to testify - on their own dime. This person would have to be an Officer or at the least a Manager of the Plaintiff entity. Figuring in the transportation and lodging costs as well as the lost productivity in the person's absence, the amount owed would have to be a LOT more than the OP has stated.


lrhall41

Submitted by on Tue, 05/12/2009 - 10:09

( Posts: | Credits: )


I wish some people would do some research before posting.

The OP can be stopped at Customs on the way out of the United Kingdom if he owes money. See HRH Edward III v Ipswitch, 23 KB 145 (AD1243) - "any knave who oweth any person in the Realm and who attempteth to leaveth the kingdom without full recompense shall be detained and flogged."; Oliver Cromwell, Protector v. HRH James I, 1752 KB 2245 (AD 1647) - "and having absconded from the realm with the Royal Treasury, the same having been properly and legally expropriated for the benefit of the Commonweal, said Sovereign is declared Guilty of violation of the King Shall Not Skedaddle Act of 1648 and hereby forfeits his Royal Head."


lrhall41

Submitted by Flyingifr on Tue, 05/12/2009 - 10:17

( Posts: 56 | Credits: )