Riddle Wood did not properly validate?

Date: Thu, 09/03/2009 - 11:21

Submitted by bea2ls
on Thu, 09/03/2009 - 11:21

Posts: 3840 Credits: [Donate]

Total Replies: 6

Hello, I have a question. About a month or so ago I started a thread about Riddle Wood, who is collecting for HSBC. They claimed to be attorneys and used attorney letterhead. This is the second or third collection agency for HSBC the others vanished after I requested validation. I sent the usual letters to Riddle Wood and today I received a response but it is not a validation at all.
It is a two page letter - the first signed by an attorney's assitant and it said "Please find all of the information our client, THE BUREAUS, has provided to us as validation for the referenced account." That was it for the first page.
The second is just a paper that said statement of account, stating BUREAUS INVESTMENT GROUP PORTFOLIO NO 13 LLC, ASSIGNEE OF HSBC CARD SERVICES, INC.
and it showed a balance, a due date of 8/19/09, statement closing date of 8/19/09 and account summary. It said my last payment was 3/31/08 and my charge off date was 11/29/08. this does not make sense to me.. the payment on 3/31/08 was made to a collectors of theirs who fell off when i started asking questions. I just am really confused.
I have paid accounts that were not fully validated (Nelson Watson barely validated it for example but I was confident they had my account.)
Is this acceptable? What are my next steps?

I dont quite get it. You owe credit cards, you owe pay day loan

I dont quite get it.
You owe credit cards, you owe pay day loans, you even owe your library !!!!!!
have you ever paid any of your bills ????
I'm just asking

lrhall41

Submitted by on Thu, 09/03/2009 - 11:28

( Posts: | Credits: )

i have no idea why I am responding to this but guest go away if

i have no idea why I am responding to this but guest go away if you like stalking me so much you will see everything that i have paid and i do pay (including the fact that i do not owe any payday loans!)

lrhall41

Submitted by bea2ls on Thu, 09/03/2009 - 11:36

( Posts: 3840 | Credits: )

yes take off clown.now bea,re-send your DV letter.unless this le

yes take off clown.now bea,re-send your DV letter.unless this letter is on the OC'S letterhead.it is not validation.that statement looks like i could havr typed it better.do not consider this proper validation,and re-send the letter.

lrhall41

Submitted by paulmergel on Thu, 09/03/2009 - 11:43

( Posts: 15514 | Credits: )

thanks, paul - those was my thoughts, too.. that it seems like s

thanks, paul - those was my thoughts, too.. that it seems like something i could have made up! should i just resend it and add that what i recieved was not proper validation? thankfully i sent the first one certified so i have that green card! :)

lrhall41

Submitted by bea2ls on Thu, 09/03/2009 - 11:45

( Posts: 3840 | Credits: )

yes,do that.also certified mail return receipt,but you knew that

yes,do that.also certified mail return receipt,but you knew that already.

lrhall41

Submitted by paulmergel on Thu, 09/03/2009 - 12:15

( Posts: 15514 | Credits: )

thanks again paul :)

lrhall41

Submitted by bea2ls on Thu, 09/03/2009 - 12:26

( Posts: 3840 | Credits: )